Compact mode
Airbus A350-900 vs Airbus A330-300 vs Boeing 767-300ER
Table of content
Basic Information Comparison
Manufacturer 🏢
The company responsible for designing and manufacturing the aircraft, representing the primary producer of the commercial airplane.Airbus A350-900Airbus A330-300Boeing 767-300EREngine Type ✈
A crucial component that defines the aircraft's propulsion system and performance characteristics,determining factors in speed,range and operational capabilities.For all*
Performance Comparison
Maximum Range 🌍
The maximum distance the aircraft can fly without refueling, measured in nautical miles.Airbus A350-900Airbus A330-300Boeing 767-300ERFuel Efficiency ⛽
Measures how efficiently the aircraft consumes fuel during operation,typically expressed in nautical miles per gallon or fuel burn rate.Airbus A350-900Airbus A330-300Boeing 767-300ERFuel Efficiency Type ⛽
Classification of the aircraft's fuel consumption efficiency level,helping operators understand relative efficiency.Airbus A350-900Airbus A330-300Boeing 767-300ERMaximum Altitude 🚀
The highest altitude at which the aircraft can safely and effectively operate,affecting route planning and operational capabilities.Airbus A350-900Airbus A330-300Boeing 767-300ERMaximum Altitude Type 🚀
Classification of the aircraft's maximum operational altitude capability,categorizing its high-altitude performance.Airbus A350-900Airbus A330-300Boeing 767-300ER
Facts Comparison
Interesting Fact 📖
Unique historical or technical fact about the aircraftAirbus A350-900- Has electrochromic windows
Airbus A330-300- Has never had a fatal accident during commercial operations
Boeing 767-300ER- Popular choice for cargo conversion
Sarcastic Fact 🤣
Humorous or ironic observation about the aircraftAirbus A350-900- The plane that makes jet lag bearable
Airbus A330-300- Sometimes called the flying pencil due to its long thin fuselage
Boeing 767-300ER- Called the flying tank due to its durability
Commercial Comparison
Specifications Comparison
Seating Capacity 👥
The maximum number of passengers that can be accommodated in the aircraft's standard configuration, determining its operational capacity.Airbus A350-900Airbus A330-300Boeing 767-300ERSeating Capacity Type ✈️
Classification of aircraft based on their passenger capacity, categorizing them into different operational segments.For all*
General Comparison
For whom 👤
Target user groups or organizations that typically operate this aircraft typeAirbus A350-900- Long-Haul TravelersAirbus A350-900 is primarily operated by Long-Haul Travelers. Aircraft equipped for maximum comfort during extended journeys Click to see all.
- Premium AirlinesAirbus A350-900 is primarily operated by Premium Airlines. Aircraft configured for high-end airline services and comfort Click to see all.
Airbus A330-300- International CarriersAirbus A330-300 is primarily operated by International Carriers. Aircraft optimized for long-haul international transportation services Click to see all.
- Charter OperatorsAirbus A330-300 is primarily operated by Charter Operators.
Boeing 767-300ER- Commercial AirlinesBoeing 767-300ER is primarily operated by Commercial Airlines. Aircraft optimized for commercial passenger operations, balancing capacity and efficiency Click to see all.
- Cargo OperatorsBoeing 767-300ER is primarily operated by Cargo Operators. Aircraft optimized for freight operations, featuring enhanced cargo capacity Click to see all.
Purpose 🎯
Primary purposes and missions the aircraft is designed to fulfillAirbus A350-900- Ultra-Long RoutesAirbus A350-900 is primarily used for Ultra-Long Routes. Aircraft specialized in extreme long-distance flights, maximizing range and efficiency Click to see all.
- IntercontinentalAirbus A350-900 is primarily used for Intercontinental.
Airbus A330-300- Long-Haul RoutesAirbus A330-300 is primarily used for Long-Haul Routes. Aircraft specialized for extended international route operations Click to see all.
- High-Density RoutesAirbus A330-300 is primarily used for High-Density Routes.
Boeing 767-300ER- Long-Haul RoutesBoeing 767-300ER is primarily used for Long-Haul Routes. Aircraft specialized for extended international route operations Click to see all.
- Cargo MissionsBoeing 767-300ER is primarily used for Cargo Missions. Specialized aircraft designed for efficient cargo transport operations Click to see all.
Made In 🏭
Country of manufacture and primary assemblyAirbus A350-900Airbus A330-300Boeing 767-300ER
Features Comparison
Known For 💡
Distinctive characteristic or notable feature of the aircraftAirbus A350-900- Passenger ComfortAirbus A350-900 is known for Passenger Comfort.
Airbus A330-300- ReliabilityAirbus A330-300 is known for Reliability.
- VersatilityAirbus A330-300 is known for Versatility.
Boeing 767-300ER- ReliabilityBoeing 767-300ER is known for Reliability.
- VersatilityBoeing 767-300ER is known for Versatility.
Pros ➕
Key advantages and strong points of the aircraftAirbus A350-900- Advanced Materials
- Quiet CabinAircraft with enhanced noise reduction in passenger cabin Click to see all.
Airbus A330-300- Proven Track Record
- Flexible Cabin ConfigurationAircraft with adaptable interior layouts for different operations Click to see all.
- Good RangeAircraft with sufficient range for typical regional operations Click to see all.
Boeing 767-300ER- Proven Reliability
- Cargo Conversion Potential
- Strong Frame
Cons ➖
Main disadvantages or limitations of the aircraftAirbus A350-900- High Acquisition CostAircraft requiring significant initial investment Click to see all.
- Maintenance Complexity
Airbus A330-300- Higher Fuel Burn Than Newer AircraftLess fuel-efficient aircraft compared to modern alternatives Click to see all.
- Older TechnologyAircraft utilizing less advanced or outdated technological solutions Click to see all.
Boeing 767-300ER
Ratings Comparison
Reliability Score 🔧
Reliability rating based on maintenance records and operational historyAirbus A350-900Airbus A330-300Boeing 767-300ERComfort Score 💱
Passenger comfort rating considering cabin design and amenitiesAirbus A350-900Airbus A330-300Boeing 767-300ERSafety Score 🛡
Safety rating based on accident history and safety featuresAirbus A350-900Airbus A330-300Boeing 767-300ERBuy It For Life ⏳
Long-term value and durability ratingAirbus A350-900Airbus A330-300Boeing 767-300ERScore ⭐
Overall rating combining all scoring attributesAirbus A350-900Airbus A330-300Boeing 767-300ER
Alternatives to Airbus A350-900
Airbus A350-1000
Known for Fuel Efficiency,Advanced Technology💱 is more comfortable than Airbus A350-900
🛡 is safer than Airbus A350-900
⏳ is more durable than Airbus A350-900
⭐ is better overall than Airbus A350-900
Boeing 777X
Known for World's Largest Twin-Engine Jet💱 is more comfortable than Airbus A350-900
🛡 is safer than Airbus A350-900
Airbus A320ceo
Known for Reliability🔧 is more reliable than Airbus A350-900
Airbus A330-800Neo
Known for New Generation Efficiency🌍 flies longer than Airbus A350-900
⛽ is more fuel efficient than Airbus A350-900
💱 is more comfortable than Airbus A350-900
Airbus A340-600
Known for Passenger Comfort👥 has more seats than Airbus A350-900
Airbus A380
Known for Largest Passenger Aircraft👥 has more seats than Airbus A350-900
💱 is more comfortable than Airbus A350-900
Boeing 747-8
Known for Queen Of The Skies👥 has more seats than Airbus A350-900
Airbus A321neo
Known for Fuel Efficiency⛽ is more fuel efficient than Airbus A350-900
🛡 is safer than Airbus A350-900