Compact mode
ATR 42-300 vs ATR 42-500
Table of content
Basic Information Comparison
Manufacturer π’
The company responsible for designing and manufacturing the aircraft, representing the primary producer of the commercial airplane.Both*Engine Type β
A crucial component that defines the aircraft's propulsion system and performance characteristics,determining factors in speed,range and operational capabilities.Both*
Performance Comparison
Maximum Range π
The maximum distance the aircraft can fly without refueling, measured in nautical miles.Both*Fuel Efficiency β½
Measures how efficiently the aircraft consumes fuel during operation,typically expressed in nautical miles per gallon or fuel burn rate.ATR 42-300ATR 42-500Fuel Efficiency Type β½
Classification of the aircraft's fuel consumption efficiency level,helping operators understand relative efficiency.Both*Maximum Altitude π
The highest altitude at which the aircraft can safely and effectively operate,affecting route planning and operational capabilities.Both*Maximum Altitude Type π
Classification of the aircraft's maximum operational altitude capability,categorizing its high-altitude performance.Both*
Facts Comparison
Interesting Fact π
Unique historical or technical fact about the aircraftATR 42-300- First ATR aircraft model
ATR 42-500- Best seller in island nations
Sarcastic Fact π€£
Humorous or ironic observation about the aircraftATR 42-300- The flying tractor
ATR 42-500- Slower than walking sometimes
Commercial Comparison
Specifications Comparison
Seating Capacity π₯
The maximum number of passengers that can be accommodated in the aircraft's standard configuration, determining its operational capacity.Both*Seating Capacity Type βοΈ
Classification of aircraft based on their passenger capacity, categorizing them into different operational segments.Both*
General Comparison
For whom π€
Target user groups or organizations that typically operate this aircraft typeATR 42-300- Regional AirlinesATR 42-300 is primarily operated by Regional Airlines. Aircraft optimized for short to medium regional routes Click to see all.
- Island CommunitiesATR 42-300 is primarily operated by Island Communities. Aircraft suitable for island-hopping and coastal operations Click to see all.
ATR 42-500- Island HoppersATR 42-500 is primarily operated by Island Hoppers.
- Regional PassengersATR 42-500 is primarily operated by Regional Passengers. Aircraft optimized for passenger comfort on regional routes Click to see all.
Purpose π―
Primary purposes and missions the aircraft is designed to fulfillBoth*ATR 42-300- Short-HaulATR 42-300 is primarily used for Short-Haul.
ATR 42-500- Short HopsATR 42-500 is primarily used for Short Hops.
Features Comparison
Known For π‘
Distinctive characteristic or notable feature of the aircraftBoth*- Fuel Economy
ATR 42-300- ReliabilityATR 42-300 is known for Reliability.
Pros β
Key advantages and strong points of the aircraftATR 42-300- Economical Operation
- Simple MaintenanceAircraft designed for easy maintenance procedures Click to see all.
ATR 42-500- Low Operating Costs
- Short Runway CapableAircraft designed for operations on compact runways Click to see all.
- Reliable
Cons β
Main disadvantages or limitations of the aircraftBoth*- Speed Limitations
ATR 42-300- Capacity Constraints
ATR 42-500
Ratings Comparison
Reliability Score π§
Reliability rating based on maintenance records and operational historyATR 42-300ATR 42-500Comfort Score π±
Passenger comfort rating considering cabin design and amenitiesATR 42-300ATR 42-500
Alternatives to ATR 42-300
ATR 72-200
Known for Fuel Economy,Reliabilityπ₯ has more seats than ATR 42-300
π flies longer than ATR 42-300
β½ is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-300
π± is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
β³ is more durable than ATR 42-300
β is better overall than ATR 42-300
ATR 42-600
Known for Fuel Efficiency,Reliabilityπ flies longer than ATR 42-300
ATR 72-600
Known for Fuel Efficiencyπ§ is more reliable than ATR 42-300
π₯ has more seats than ATR 42-300
π flies longer than ATR 42-300
β½ is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-300
π± is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
ATR 72-500
Known for Fuel Efficiency,Reliabilityπ₯ has more seats than ATR 42-300
π flies longer than ATR 42-300
β½ is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-300
π± is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
ATR 72-400
Known for Cost Effectivenessπ₯ has more seats than ATR 42-300
π flies longer than ATR 42-300
ATR 72-700
Known for Fuel Efficient Turbopropπ₯ has more seats than ATR 42-300
π flies longer than ATR 42-300
β½ is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-300
π± is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
π‘ is safer than ATR 42-300
β is better overall than ATR 42-300
Saab 340
Known for Reliability,Efficiencyπ flies longer than ATR 42-300
π± is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
π‘ is safer than ATR 42-300
Bombardier Q300
Known for Noise Reduction,Efficiencyπ§ is more reliable than ATR 42-300
π₯ has more seats than ATR 42-300
π flies longer than ATR 42-300
π± is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
π‘ is safer than ATR 42-300
β is better overall than ATR 42-300
Bombardier Q400
Known for Performance,Versatilityπ₯ has more seats than ATR 42-300
π flies longer than ATR 42-300
π flies higher than ATR 42-300
π± is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
π‘ is safer than ATR 42-300
Embraer E175-E2
Known for Efficiency,Modern Designπ₯ has more seats than ATR 42-300
π flies longer than ATR 42-300
π flies higher than ATR 42-300
π± is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
π‘ is safer than ATR 42-300
β is better overall than ATR 42-300