Compact mode
ATR 72-700 vs ATR 42-300
Table of content
Basic Information Comparison
Manufacturer π’
The company responsible for designing and manufacturing the aircraft, representing the primary producer of the commercial airplane.Both*Engine Type β
A crucial component that defines the aircraft's propulsion system and performance characteristics,determining factors in speed,range and operational capabilities.Both*
Performance Comparison
Maximum Range π
The maximum distance the aircraft can fly without refueling, measured in nautical miles.ATR 72-700ATR 42-300Fuel Efficiency β½
Measures how efficiently the aircraft consumes fuel during operation,typically expressed in nautical miles per gallon or fuel burn rate.ATR 72-700ATR 42-300Fuel Efficiency Type β½
Classification of the aircraft's fuel consumption efficiency level,helping operators understand relative efficiency.Both*Maximum Altitude π
The highest altitude at which the aircraft can safely and effectively operate,affecting route planning and operational capabilities.Both*Maximum Altitude Type π
Classification of the aircraft's maximum operational altitude capability,categorizing its high-altitude performance.Both*
Facts Comparison
Interesting Fact π
Unique historical or technical fact about the aircraftATR 72-700- Most successful regional turboprop
ATR 42-300- First ATR aircraft model
Sarcastic Fact π€£
Humorous or ironic observation about the aircraftATR 72-700- Still using propellers in jet age
ATR 42-300- The flying tractor
Commercial Comparison
Specifications Comparison
Seating Capacity π₯
The maximum number of passengers that can be accommodated in the aircraft's standard configuration, determining its operational capacity.ATR 72-700ATR 42-300Seating Capacity Type βοΈ
Classification of aircraft based on their passenger capacity, categorizing them into different operational segments.Both*
General Comparison
For whom π€
Target user groups or organizations that typically operate this aircraft typeATR 72-700- Regional PassengersATR 72-700 is primarily operated by Regional Passengers. Aircraft optimized for passenger comfort on regional routes Click to see all.
- Island HoppersATR 72-700 is primarily operated by Island Hoppers.
ATR 42-300Purpose π―
Primary purposes and missions the aircraft is designed to fulfillATR 72-700- Short-Haul RoutesATR 72-700 is primarily used for Short-Haul Routes.
- Island ConnectionsATR 72-700 is primarily used for Island Connections. Aircraft suitable for island-hopping and coastal operations Click to see all.
ATR 42-300- Short-HaulATR 42-300 is primarily used for Short-Haul.
- Remote AccessATR 42-300 is primarily used for Remote Access. Aircraft capable of operating in remote and challenging locations Click to see all.
Features Comparison
Known For π‘
Distinctive characteristic or notable feature of the aircraftATR 72-700- Fuel Efficient TurbopropATR 72-700 is known for Fuel Efficient Turboprop.
ATR 42-300- Fuel EconomyATR 42-300 is known for Fuel Economy.
- ReliabilityATR 42-300 is known for Reliability.
Pros β
Key advantages and strong points of the aircraftATR 72-700- Low Operating Costs
- Reliable Performance
- Short Runway CapableAircraft designed for operations on compact runways Click to see all.
ATR 42-300Cons β
Main disadvantages or limitations of the aircraftBoth*- Speed Limitations
ATR 72-700ATR 42-300- Capacity Constraints
Ratings Comparison
Reliability Score π§
Reliability rating based on maintenance records and operational historyATR 72-700ATR 42-300Comfort Score π±
Passenger comfort rating considering cabin design and amenitiesATR 72-700ATR 42-300
Alternatives to ATR 72-700
ATR 42-600
Known for Fuel Efficiency,Reliabilityπ flies longer than ATR 42-300
ATR 72-200
Known for Fuel Economy,Reliabilityπ₯ has more seats than ATR 42-300
π flies longer than ATR 42-300
β½ is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-300
π± is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
β³ is more durable than ATR 42-300
β is better overall than ATR 42-300
ATR 42-500
Known for Fuel Economyβ½ is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-300
π± is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
ATR 72-500
Known for Fuel Efficiency,Reliabilityπ₯ has more seats than ATR 42-300
π flies longer than ATR 42-300
β½ is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-300
π± is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
ATR 72-600
Known for Fuel Efficiencyπ§ is more reliable than ATR 42-300
π₯ has more seats than ATR 42-300
π flies longer than ATR 42-300
β½ is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-300
π± is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
ATR 72-400
Known for Cost Effectivenessπ₯ has more seats than ATR 42-300
π flies longer than ATR 42-300
Saab 340
Known for Reliability,Efficiencyπ flies longer than ATR 42-300
π± is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
π‘ is safer than ATR 42-300
Bombardier Q300
Known for Noise Reduction,Efficiencyπ§ is more reliable than ATR 42-300
π₯ has more seats than ATR 42-300
π flies longer than ATR 42-300
π± is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
π‘ is safer than ATR 42-300
β is better overall than ATR 42-300
Embraer E175-E2
Known for Efficiency,Modern Designπ₯ has more seats than ATR 42-300
π flies longer than ATR 42-300
π flies higher than ATR 42-300
π± is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
π‘ is safer than ATR 42-300
β is better overall than ATR 42-300
Embraer E145
Known for Efficiency,Reliabilityπ§ is more reliable than ATR 42-300
π₯ has more seats than ATR 42-300
π flies longer than ATR 42-300
π flies higher than ATR 42-300
π± is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
π‘ is safer than ATR 42-300