Compact mode
ATR 42-300 vs Saab 340 vs ATR 42-600
Table of content
Basic Information Comparison
Manufacturer π’
The company responsible for designing and manufacturing the aircraft, representing the primary producer of the commercial airplane.ATR 42-300Saab 340ATR 42-600Engine Type β
A crucial component that defines the aircraft's propulsion system and performance characteristics,determining factors in speed,range and operational capabilities.For all*
Performance Comparison
Maximum Range π
The maximum distance the aircraft can fly without refueling, measured in nautical miles.ATR 42-300Saab 340ATR 42-600Fuel Efficiency β½
Measures how efficiently the aircraft consumes fuel during operation,typically expressed in nautical miles per gallon or fuel burn rate.ATR 42-300Saab 340ATR 42-600Fuel Efficiency Type β½
Classification of the aircraft's fuel consumption efficiency level,helping operators understand relative efficiency.ATR 42-300Saab 340ATR 42-600Maximum Altitude π
The highest altitude at which the aircraft can safely and effectively operate,affecting route planning and operational capabilities.For all*Maximum Altitude Type π
Classification of the aircraft's maximum operational altitude capability,categorizing its high-altitude performance.For all*
Facts Comparison
Interesting Fact π
Unique historical or technical fact about the aircraftATR 42-300- First ATR aircraft model
Saab 340- Originally co-developed with Fairchild
ATR 42-600- Can land on unpaved runways
Sarcastic Fact π€£
Humorous or ironic observation about the aircraftATR 42-300- The flying tractor
Saab 340- The Swedish meatball with wings
ATR 42-600- Pilots joke it's more reliable than their marriages
Commercial Comparison
Specifications Comparison
Seating Capacity π₯
The maximum number of passengers that can be accommodated in the aircraft's standard configuration, determining its operational capacity.ATR 42-300Saab 340ATR 42-600Seating Capacity Type βοΈ
Classification of aircraft based on their passenger capacity, categorizing them into different operational segments.For all*
General Comparison
For whom π€
Target user groups or organizations that typically operate this aircraft typeATR 42-300- Regional AirlinesATR 42-300 is primarily operated by Regional Airlines. Aircraft optimized for short to medium regional routes Click to see all.
- Island CommunitiesATR 42-300 is primarily operated by Island Communities. Aircraft suitable for island-hopping and coastal operations Click to see all.
Saab 340- Regional CarriersSaab 340 is primarily operated by Regional Carriers. Aircraft specialized for regional route operations Click to see all.
- Commuter AirlinesSaab 340 is primarily operated by Commuter Airlines.
ATR 42-600- Regional AirlinesATR 42-600 is primarily operated by Regional Airlines. Aircraft optimized for short to medium regional routes Click to see all.
- Island HoppersATR 42-600 is primarily operated by Island Hoppers.
- Regional MarketsATR 42-600 is primarily operated by Regional Markets. Airplanes designed specifically for serving regional markets with focus on efficiency and reliability Click to see all.
Purpose π―
Primary purposes and missions the aircraft is designed to fulfillATR 42-300- Short-HaulATR 42-300 is primarily used for Short-Haul.
- Remote AccessATR 42-300 is primarily used for Remote Access. Aircraft capable of operating in remote and challenging locations Click to see all.
Saab 340- Regional RoutesSaab 340 is primarily used for Regional Routes. Aircraft optimized for short-distance regional travel Click to see all.
- Feeder ServiceSaab 340 is primarily used for Feeder Service.
ATR 42-600- Short RoutesATR 42-600 is primarily used for Short Routes. Aircraft designed for efficient short-distance travel Click to see all.
- Remote LocationsATR 42-600 is primarily used for Remote Locations. Aircraft specialized in serving isolated and difficult-to-reach areas Click to see all.
- Short-HaulATR 42-600 is primarily used for Short-Haul.
- Island RoutesATR 42-600 is primarily used for Island Routes. Aircraft designed for inter-island transportation services Click to see all.
Features Comparison
Known For π‘
Distinctive characteristic or notable feature of the aircraftFor all*- Reliability
ATR 42-300- Fuel EconomyATR 42-300 is known for Fuel Economy.
Saab 340- EfficiencySaab 340 is known for Efficiency.
ATR 42-600- Fuel EfficiencyATR 42-600 is known for Fuel Efficiency.
Pros β
Key advantages and strong points of the aircraftATR 42-300- Economical Operation
- Simple MaintenanceAircraft designed for easy maintenance procedures Click to see all.
Saab 340- Low Operating Costs
- Durability
ATR 42-600- Low Operating Costs
- Short Runway Capability
- Robust DesignAircraft built for durability and reliability Click to see all.
- Fuel EfficientAircraft optimized for minimal fuel consumption and environmental impact Click to see all.
- Short Runway CapableAircraft designed for operations on compact runways Click to see all.
Cons β
Main disadvantages or limitations of the aircraftATR 42-300- Speed Limitations
- Capacity Constraints
Saab 340- Limited RangeAircraft that can only operate on shorter routes due to fuel capacity or efficiency limitations Click to see all.
- Small CapacityAircraft designed to carry fewer passengers than typical commercial planes Click to see all.
ATR 42-600- Limited Speed
- Weather SensitivityAircraft requiring specific weather conditions for safe operation Click to see all.
- Limited RangeAircraft that can only operate on shorter routes due to fuel capacity or efficiency limitations Click to see all.
- Speed RestrictionsAircraft that operate under specific speed constraints Click to see all.
Ratings Comparison
Reliability Score π§
Reliability rating based on maintenance records and operational historyATR 42-300Saab 340ATR 42-600Comfort Score π±
Passenger comfort rating considering cabin design and amenitiesATR 42-300Saab 340ATR 42-600Safety Score π‘
Safety rating based on accident history and safety featuresATR 42-300Saab 340ATR 42-600
Alternatives to ATR 42-300
ATR 72-200
Known for Fuel Economy,Reliabilityπ₯ has more seats than ATR 42-300
π flies longer than ATR 42-300
β½ is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-300
π± is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
β³ is more durable than ATR 42-300
β is better overall than ATR 42-300
ATR 42-500
Known for Fuel Economyβ½ is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-300
π± is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
ATR 72-600
Known for Fuel Efficiencyπ§ is more reliable than ATR 42-300
π₯ has more seats than ATR 42-300
π flies longer than ATR 42-300
β½ is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-300
π± is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
ATR 72-500
Known for Fuel Efficiency,Reliabilityπ₯ has more seats than ATR 42-300
π flies longer than ATR 42-300
β½ is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-300
π± is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
ATR 72-400
Known for Cost Effectivenessπ₯ has more seats than ATR 42-300
π flies longer than ATR 42-300
ATR 72-700
Known for Fuel Efficient Turbopropπ₯ has more seats than ATR 42-300
π flies longer than ATR 42-300
β½ is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-300
π± is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
π‘ is safer than ATR 42-300
β is better overall than ATR 42-300
Bombardier Q300
Known for Noise Reduction,Efficiencyπ§ is more reliable than ATR 42-300
π₯ has more seats than ATR 42-300
π flies longer than ATR 42-300
π± is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
π‘ is safer than ATR 42-300
β is better overall than ATR 42-300
Airbus A330-800Neo
Known for New Generation Efficiencyπ₯ has more seats than ATR 42-300
π flies longer than ATR 42-300
β½ is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-300
π flies higher than ATR 42-300
π± is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
π‘ is safer than ATR 42-300
β is better overall than ATR 42-300
Embraer E145
Known for Efficiency,Reliabilityπ§ is more reliable than ATR 42-300
π₯ has more seats than ATR 42-300
π flies longer than ATR 42-300
π flies higher than ATR 42-300
π± is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
π‘ is safer than ATR 42-300
Bombardier Q400
Known for Performance,Versatilityπ₯ has more seats than ATR 42-300
π flies longer than ATR 42-300
π flies higher than ATR 42-300
π± is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
π‘ is safer than ATR 42-300