Compact mode
ATR 72-200 vs ATR 72-500 vs ATR 42-600
Table of content
Basic Information Comparison
Manufacturer π’
The company responsible for designing and manufacturing the aircraft, representing the primary producer of the commercial airplane.For all*Engine Type β
A crucial component that defines the aircraft's propulsion system and performance characteristics,determining factors in speed,range and operational capabilities.For all*
Performance Comparison
Maximum Range π
The maximum distance the aircraft can fly without refueling, measured in nautical miles.ATR 72-200ATR 72-500ATR 42-600Fuel Efficiency β½
Measures how efficiently the aircraft consumes fuel during operation,typically expressed in nautical miles per gallon or fuel burn rate.ATR 72-200ATR 72-500ATR 42-600Fuel Efficiency Type β½
Classification of the aircraft's fuel consumption efficiency level,helping operators understand relative efficiency.For all*Maximum Altitude π
The highest altitude at which the aircraft can safely and effectively operate,affecting route planning and operational capabilities.For all*Maximum Altitude Type π
Classification of the aircraft's maximum operational altitude capability,categorizing its high-altitude performance.For all*
Facts Comparison
Interesting Fact π
Unique historical or technical fact about the aircraftATR 72-200- Best Selling Turboprop
ATR 72-500- Most popular turboprop in its class
ATR 42-600- Can land on unpaved runways
Sarcastic Fact π€£
Humorous or ironic observation about the aircraftATR 72-200- Can land on water if you try hard enough
ATR 72-500- Slower than driving but more scenic
ATR 42-600- Pilots joke it's more reliable than their marriages
Commercial Comparison
Specifications Comparison
Seating Capacity π₯
The maximum number of passengers that can be accommodated in the aircraft's standard configuration, determining its operational capacity.ATR 72-200ATR 72-500ATR 42-600Seating Capacity Type βοΈ
Classification of aircraft based on their passenger capacity, categorizing them into different operational segments.For all*
General Comparison
For whom π€
Target user groups or organizations that typically operate this aircraft typeFor all*- Island Hoppers
ATR 72-200ATR 72-500ATR 42-600- Regional AirlinesATR 42-600 is primarily operated by Regional Airlines. Aircraft optimized for short to medium regional routes Click to see all.
- Regional MarketsATR 42-600 is primarily operated by Regional Markets. Airplanes designed specifically for serving regional markets with focus on efficiency and reliability Click to see all.
Purpose π―
Primary purposes and missions the aircraft is designed to fulfillATR 72-200- Short Distance RoutesATR 72-200 is primarily used for Short Distance Routes.
ATR 72-500- Short RoutesATR 72-500 is primarily used for Short Routes. Aircraft designed for efficient short-distance travel Click to see all.
- Island ConnectionsATR 72-500 is primarily used for Island Connections. Aircraft suitable for island-hopping and coastal operations Click to see all.
ATR 42-600- Short RoutesATR 42-600 is primarily used for Short Routes. Aircraft designed for efficient short-distance travel Click to see all.
- Remote LocationsATR 42-600 is primarily used for Remote Locations. Aircraft specialized in serving isolated and difficult-to-reach areas Click to see all.
- Short-HaulATR 42-600 is primarily used for Short-Haul.
- Island RoutesATR 42-600 is primarily used for Island Routes. Aircraft designed for inter-island transportation services Click to see all.
Features Comparison
Known For π‘
Distinctive characteristic or notable feature of the aircraftFor all*- Reliability
ATR 72-200- Fuel EconomyATR 72-200 is known for Fuel Economy.
ATR 72-500- Fuel EfficiencyATR 72-500 is known for Fuel Efficiency.
ATR 42-600- Fuel EfficiencyATR 42-600 is known for Fuel Efficiency.
Pros β
Key advantages and strong points of the aircraftFor all*- Low Operating Costs
ATR 72-200- Short Runway Capability
ATR 72-500- Simple MaintenanceAircraft designed for easy maintenance procedures Click to see all.
- Good For Short RunwaysAircraft capable of operating from shorter airfields and limited runways Click to see all.
ATR 42-600Cons β
Main disadvantages or limitations of the aircraftATR 72-200- Speed Limitations
- Weather SensitivityAircraft requiring specific weather conditions for safe operation Click to see all.
ATR 72-500- Speed Limitations
- Weather SensitiveAircraft with operational limitations in certain weather conditions Click to see all.
ATR 42-600- Limited Speed
- Weather SensitivityAircraft requiring specific weather conditions for safe operation Click to see all.
- Limited RangeAircraft that can only operate on shorter routes due to fuel capacity or efficiency limitations Click to see all.
- Speed RestrictionsAircraft that operate under specific speed constraints Click to see all.
Ratings Comparison
Reliability Score π§
Reliability rating based on maintenance records and operational historyATR 72-200ATR 72-500ATR 42-600Comfort Score π±
Passenger comfort rating considering cabin design and amenitiesATR 72-200ATR 72-500ATR 42-600Safety Score π‘
Safety rating based on accident history and safety featuresATR 72-200ATR 72-500ATR 42-600
Alternatives to ATR 72-200
ATR 72-700
Known for Fuel Efficient Turbopropπ₯ has more seats than ATR 72-200
π flies longer than ATR 72-200
π± is more comfortable than ATR 72-200
π‘ is safer than ATR 72-200
ATR 72-600
Known for Fuel Efficiencyπ§ is more reliable than ATR 72-200
π₯ has more seats than ATR 72-200
π flies longer than ATR 72-200
ATR 72-400
Known for Cost Effectivenessπ flies longer than ATR 72-200
Bombardier Q300
Known for Noise Reduction,Efficiencyπ§ is more reliable than ATR 72-200
π flies longer than ATR 72-200
π‘ is safer than ATR 72-200
Saab 340
Known for Reliability,Efficiencyπ flies longer than ATR 72-200
π‘ is safer than ATR 72-200
Dornier 328JET
Known for German Engineeringπ flies longer than ATR 72-200
π flies higher than ATR 72-200
Embraer E190-E1
Known for Efficiency,Reliabilityπ§ is more reliable than ATR 72-200
π₯ has more seats than ATR 72-200
π flies longer than ATR 72-200
π flies higher than ATR 72-200
π± is more comfortable than ATR 72-200
π‘ is safer than ATR 72-200
β is better overall than ATR 72-200
Bombardier CRJ-900
Known for Reliability,Cost Efficiencyπ₯ has more seats than ATR 72-200
π flies longer than ATR 72-200
π flies higher than ATR 72-200