Compact mode
ATR 72-500 vs Airbus A310-300 vs ATR 72-400
Table of content
Basic Information Comparison
Manufacturer 🏢
The company responsible for designing and manufacturing the aircraft, representing the primary producer of the commercial airplane.ATR 72-500Airbus A310-300ATR 72-400Engine Type ✈
A crucial component that defines the aircraft's propulsion system and performance characteristics,determining factors in speed,range and operational capabilities.ATR 72-500Airbus A310-300ATR 72-400
Performance Comparison
Maximum Range 🌍
The maximum distance the aircraft can fly without refueling, measured in nautical miles.ATR 72-500Airbus A310-300ATR 72-400Fuel Efficiency ⛽
Measures how efficiently the aircraft consumes fuel during operation,typically expressed in nautical miles per gallon or fuel burn rate.ATR 72-500Airbus A310-300ATR 72-400Fuel Efficiency Type ⛽
Classification of the aircraft's fuel consumption efficiency level,helping operators understand relative efficiency.ATR 72-500Airbus A310-300ATR 72-400Maximum Altitude 🚀
The highest altitude at which the aircraft can safely and effectively operate,affecting route planning and operational capabilities.ATR 72-500Airbus A310-300ATR 72-400Maximum Altitude Type 🚀
Classification of the aircraft's maximum operational altitude capability,categorizing its high-altitude performance.ATR 72-500Airbus A310-300ATR 72-400
Facts Comparison
Interesting Fact 📖
Unique historical or technical fact about the aircraftATR 72-500- Most popular turboprop in its class
Airbus A310-300- First Airbus with Two-Crew Digital Cockpit
ATR 72-400- Most successful regional aircraft in history
Sarcastic Fact 🤣
Humorous or ironic observation about the aircraftATR 72-500- Slower than driving but more scenic
Airbus A310-300- Looks like a shrunk A300 that went through the wash
ATR 72-400- Slower than a sports car but costs 100 times more
Commercial Comparison
Specifications Comparison
Seating Capacity 👥
The maximum number of passengers that can be accommodated in the aircraft's standard configuration, determining its operational capacity.ATR 72-500Airbus A310-300ATR 72-400Seating Capacity Type ✈️
Classification of aircraft based on their passenger capacity, categorizing them into different operational segments.ATR 72-500Airbus A310-300ATR 72-400
General Comparison
For whom 👤
Target user groups or organizations that typically operate this aircraft typeATR 72-500- Regional TravelersATR 72-500 is primarily operated by Regional Travelers. Aircraft suitable for frequent regional travel with enhanced comfort features Click to see all.
- Island HoppersATR 72-500 is primarily operated by Island Hoppers.
Airbus A310-300- Regional CarriersAirbus A310-300 is primarily operated by Regional Carriers. Aircraft specialized for regional route operations Click to see all.
- Mid-Size AirlinesAirbus A310-300 is primarily operated by Mid-Size Airlines.
ATR 72-400- Regional CarriersATR 72-400 is primarily operated by Regional Carriers. Aircraft specialized for regional route operations Click to see all.
- Island HoppersATR 72-400 is primarily operated by Island Hoppers.
Purpose 🎯
Primary purposes and missions the aircraft is designed to fulfillATR 72-500- Short RoutesATR 72-500 is primarily used for Short Routes. Aircraft designed for efficient short-distance travel Click to see all.
- Island ConnectionsATR 72-500 is primarily used for Island Connections. Aircraft suitable for island-hopping and coastal operations Click to see all.
Airbus A310-300- Medium-Haul RoutesAirbus A310-300 is primarily used for Medium-Haul Routes. Aircraft optimized for routes between major regional destinations Click to see all.
- Cargo OperationsAirbus A310-300 is primarily used for Cargo Operations.
ATR 72-400
Features Comparison
Known For 💡
Distinctive characteristic or notable feature of the aircraftATR 72-500- Fuel EfficiencyATR 72-500 is known for Fuel Efficiency.
- ReliabilityATR 72-500 is known for Reliability.
Airbus A310-300- Fuel EfficiencyAirbus A310-300 is known for Fuel Efficiency.
ATR 72-400- Cost EffectivenessATR 72-400 is known for Cost Effectiveness.
Pros ➕
Key advantages and strong points of the aircraftATR 72-500- Low Operating Costs
- Simple MaintenanceAircraft designed for easy maintenance procedures Click to see all.
- Good For Short RunwaysAircraft capable of operating from shorter airfields and limited runways Click to see all.
Airbus A310-300- Versatile DesignAircraft adaptable to various operational requirements Click to see all.
- Good RangeAircraft with sufficient range for typical regional operations Click to see all.
- Reliable Operations
ATR 72-400- Low Operating Costs
- Short Runway Capability
Cons ➖
Main disadvantages or limitations of the aircraftATR 72-500- Speed Limitations
- Weather SensitiveAircraft with operational limitations in certain weather conditions Click to see all.
Airbus A310-300- Limited ProductionAircraft models produced in small quantities due to various market or manufacturing constraints Click to see all.
- Aging Fleet
- Higher Maintenance Costs
ATR 72-400
Ratings Comparison
Reliability Score 🔧
Reliability rating based on maintenance records and operational historyFor all*Comfort Score 💱
Passenger comfort rating considering cabin design and amenitiesATR 72-500Airbus A310-300ATR 72-400Safety Score 🛡
Safety rating based on accident history and safety featuresATR 72-500Airbus A310-300ATR 72-400
Alternatives to ATR 72-500
ATR 72-600
Known for Fuel Efficiency🔧 is more reliable than ATR 72-500
👥 has more seats than ATR 72-500
🛡 is safer than ATR 72-500
⏳ is more durable than ATR 72-500
⭐ is better overall than ATR 72-500
ATR 72-200
Known for Fuel Economy,Reliability🔧 is more reliable than ATR 72-500
🛡 is safer than ATR 72-500
⏳ is more durable than ATR 72-500
⭐ is better overall than ATR 72-500
ATR 42-600
Known for Fuel Efficiency,Reliability🛡 is safer than ATR 72-500
ATR 72-700
Known for Fuel Efficient Turboprop🔧 is more reliable than ATR 72-500
👥 has more seats than ATR 72-500
💱 is more comfortable than ATR 72-500
🛡 is safer than ATR 72-500
⏳ is more durable than ATR 72-500
⭐ is better overall than ATR 72-500
ATR 42-500
Known for Fuel Economy⏳ is more durable than ATR 72-500
ATR 42-300
Known for Fuel Economy,Reliability🔧 is more reliable than ATR 72-500
🛡 is safer than ATR 72-500
⏳ is more durable than ATR 72-500
⭐ is better overall than ATR 72-500
Bombardier Q300
Known for Noise Reduction,Efficiency🔧 is more reliable than ATR 72-500
🛡 is safer than ATR 72-500
⏳ is more durable than ATR 72-500
⭐ is better overall than ATR 72-500
Saab 340
Known for Reliability,Efficiency🔧 is more reliable than ATR 72-500
🛡 is safer than ATR 72-500
⏳ is more durable than ATR 72-500
⭐ is better overall than ATR 72-500
Airbus A319
Known for Fuel Efficiency🔧 is more reliable than ATR 72-500
👥 has more seats than ATR 72-500
🌍 flies longer than ATR 72-500
🚀 flies higher than ATR 72-500
💱 is more comfortable than ATR 72-500
🛡 is safer than ATR 72-500
⭐ is better overall than ATR 72-500
Bombardier CRJ-1000
Known for High Frequency Operations🔧 is more reliable than ATR 72-500
👥 has more seats than ATR 72-500
🚀 flies higher than ATR 72-500
🛡 is safer than ATR 72-500