Compact mode
Airbus A320neo vs ATR 72-600 vs ATR 42-500
Table of content
Basic Information Comparison
Manufacturer 🏢
The company responsible for designing and manufacturing the aircraft, representing the primary producer of the commercial airplane.Airbus A320neoATR 72-600ATR 42-500Engine Type ✈
A crucial component that defines the aircraft's propulsion system and performance characteristics,determining factors in speed,range and operational capabilities.Airbus A320neoATR 72-600ATR 42-500
Performance Comparison
Maximum Range 🌍
The maximum distance the aircraft can fly without refueling, measured in nautical miles.Airbus A320neoATR 72-600ATR 42-500Fuel Efficiency ⛽
Measures how efficiently the aircraft consumes fuel during operation,typically expressed in nautical miles per gallon or fuel burn rate.Airbus A320neoATR 72-600ATR 42-500Fuel Efficiency Type ⛽
Classification of the aircraft's fuel consumption efficiency level,helping operators understand relative efficiency.For all*Maximum Altitude 🚀
The highest altitude at which the aircraft can safely and effectively operate,affecting route planning and operational capabilities.Airbus A320neoATR 72-600ATR 42-500Maximum Altitude Type 🚀
Classification of the aircraft's maximum operational altitude capability,categorizing its high-altitude performance.Airbus A320neoATR 72-600ATR 42-500
Facts Comparison
Interesting Fact 📖
Unique historical or technical fact about the aircraftAirbus A320neo- Uses 20% less fuel than predecessor
ATR 72-600- Most popular turboprop
ATR 42-500- Best seller in island nations
Sarcastic Fact 🤣
Humorous or ironic observation about the aircraftAirbus A320neo- The plane that made Boeing nervous
ATR 72-600- Proof that propellers aren't extinct
ATR 42-500- Slower than walking sometimes
Commercial Comparison
Specifications Comparison
Seating Capacity 👥
The maximum number of passengers that can be accommodated in the aircraft's standard configuration, determining its operational capacity.Airbus A320neoATR 72-600ATR 42-500Seating Capacity Type ✈️
Classification of aircraft based on their passenger capacity, categorizing them into different operational segments.Airbus A320neoATR 72-600ATR 42-500
General Comparison
For whom 👤
Target user groups or organizations that typically operate this aircraft typeAirbus A320neo- Business TravelersAirbus A320neo is primarily operated by Business Travelers. Aircraft designed with business passenger needs, offering productivity and comfort Click to see all.
- Economy TravelersAirbus A320neo is primarily operated by Economy Travelers.
ATR 72-600- Regional TravelersATR 72-600 is primarily operated by Regional Travelers. Aircraft suitable for frequent regional travel with enhanced comfort features Click to see all.
- Island HoppersATR 72-600 is primarily operated by Island Hoppers.
ATR 42-500- Island HoppersATR 42-500 is primarily operated by Island Hoppers.
- Regional PassengersATR 42-500 is primarily operated by Regional Passengers. Aircraft optimized for passenger comfort on regional routes Click to see all.
Purpose 🎯
Primary purposes and missions the aircraft is designed to fulfillAirbus A320neo- Short-Medium RoutesAirbus A320neo is primarily used for Short-Medium Routes.
- City PairsAirbus A320neo is primarily used for City Pairs. Aircraft optimized for specific city-to-city route operations Click to see all.
ATR 72-600- Short RoutesATR 72-600 is primarily used for Short Routes. Aircraft designed for efficient short-distance travel Click to see all.
- Island ConnectionsATR 72-600 is primarily used for Island Connections. Aircraft suitable for island-hopping and coastal operations Click to see all.
ATR 42-500- Short HopsATR 42-500 is primarily used for Short Hops.
- Remote AccessATR 42-500 is primarily used for Remote Access. Aircraft capable of operating in remote and challenging locations Click to see all.
Features Comparison
Known For 💡
Distinctive characteristic or notable feature of the aircraftAirbus A320neo- Fuel EfficiencyAirbus A320neo is known for Fuel Efficiency.
ATR 72-600- Fuel EfficiencyATR 72-600 is known for Fuel Efficiency.
ATR 42-500- Fuel EconomyATR 42-500 is known for Fuel Economy.
Pros ➕
Key advantages and strong points of the aircraftAirbus A320neo- Low Operating Costs
- Reliable
ATR 72-600- Economic Operations
- Reliability
ATR 42-500- Low Operating Costs
- Short Runway CapableAircraft designed for operations on compact runways Click to see all.
- Reliable
Cons ➖
Main disadvantages or limitations of the aircraftAirbus A320neoATR 72-600- Speed Limitations
- Weather SensitivityAircraft requiring specific weather conditions for safe operation Click to see all.
ATR 42-500
Ratings Comparison
Reliability Score 🔧
Reliability rating based on maintenance records and operational historyAirbus A320neoATR 72-600ATR 42-500Comfort Score 💱
Passenger comfort rating considering cabin design and amenitiesAirbus A320neoATR 72-600ATR 42-500Safety Score 🛡
Safety rating based on accident history and safety featuresAirbus A320neoATR 72-600ATR 42-500
Alternatives to Airbus A320neo
ATR 72-700
Known for Fuel Efficient Turboprop💱 is more comfortable than ATR 72-600
🛡 is safer than ATR 72-600
⏳ is more durable than ATR 72-600
⭐ is better overall than ATR 72-600
ATR 72-500
Known for Fuel Efficiency,Reliability🌍 flies longer than ATR 72-600
⛽ is more fuel efficient than ATR 72-600
💱 is more comfortable than ATR 72-600
ATR 72-200
Known for Fuel Economy,Reliability💱 is more comfortable than ATR 72-600
⏳ is more durable than ATR 72-600
⭐ is better overall than ATR 72-600
ATR 72-400
Known for Cost Effectiveness🌍 flies longer than ATR 72-600
ATR 42-300
Known for Fuel Economy,Reliability⏳ is more durable than ATR 72-600
Bombardier Q300
Known for Noise Reduction,Efficiency🔧 is more reliable than ATR 72-600
💱 is more comfortable than ATR 72-600
🛡 is safer than ATR 72-600
⏳ is more durable than ATR 72-600
⭐ is better overall than ATR 72-600
Embraer E170
Known for Efficiency🌍 flies longer than ATR 72-600
🚀 flies higher than ATR 72-600
💱 is more comfortable than ATR 72-600
🛡 is safer than ATR 72-600
⭐ is better overall than ATR 72-600
Saab 340
Known for Reliability,Efficiency🛡 is safer than ATR 72-600
Airbus A321XLR
Known for Range,Efficiency👥 has more seats than ATR 72-600
🌍 flies longer than ATR 72-600
🚀 flies higher than ATR 72-600
💱 is more comfortable than ATR 72-600
🛡 is safer than ATR 72-600
⭐ is better overall than ATR 72-600