Compact mode
Bombardier Q300 vs ATR 42-300 vs ATR 42-500
Table of content
Basic Information Comparison
Manufacturer π’
The company responsible for designing and manufacturing the aircraft, representing the primary producer of the commercial airplane.Bombardier Q300ATR 42-300ATR 42-500Engine Type β
A crucial component that defines the aircraft's propulsion system and performance characteristics,determining factors in speed,range and operational capabilities.For all*
Performance Comparison
Maximum Range π
The maximum distance the aircraft can fly without refueling, measured in nautical miles.Bombardier Q300ATR 42-300ATR 42-500Fuel Efficiency β½
Measures how efficiently the aircraft consumes fuel during operation,typically expressed in nautical miles per gallon or fuel burn rate.Bombardier Q300ATR 42-300ATR 42-500Fuel Efficiency Type β½
Classification of the aircraft's fuel consumption efficiency level,helping operators understand relative efficiency.For all*Maximum Altitude π
The highest altitude at which the aircraft can safely and effectively operate,affecting route planning and operational capabilities.For all*Maximum Altitude Type π
Classification of the aircraft's maximum operational altitude capability,categorizing its high-altitude performance.For all*
Facts Comparison
Interesting Fact π
Unique historical or technical fact about the aircraftBombardier Q300- Features active noise control system
ATR 42-300- First ATR aircraft model
ATR 42-500- Best seller in island nations
Sarcastic Fact π€£
Humorous or ironic observation about the aircraftBombardier Q300- The whispering workhorse
ATR 42-300- The flying tractor
ATR 42-500- Slower than walking sometimes
Commercial Comparison
Specifications Comparison
Seating Capacity π₯
The maximum number of passengers that can be accommodated in the aircraft's standard configuration, determining its operational capacity.Bombardier Q300ATR 42-300ATR 42-500Seating Capacity Type βοΈ
Classification of aircraft based on their passenger capacity, categorizing them into different operational segments.For all*
General Comparison
For whom π€
Target user groups or organizations that typically operate this aircraft typeBombardier Q300- Regional CarriersBombardier Q300 is primarily operated by Regional Carriers. Aircraft specialized for regional route operations Click to see all.
- CommutersBombardier Q300 is primarily operated by Commuters. Aircraft designed for frequent short-haul flights, prioritizing efficiency Click to see all.
ATR 42-300- Regional AirlinesATR 42-300 is primarily operated by Regional Airlines. Aircraft optimized for short to medium regional routes Click to see all.
- Island CommunitiesATR 42-300 is primarily operated by Island Communities. Aircraft suitable for island-hopping and coastal operations Click to see all.
ATR 42-500- Island HoppersATR 42-500 is primarily operated by Island Hoppers.
- Regional PassengersATR 42-500 is primarily operated by Regional Passengers. Aircraft optimized for passenger comfort on regional routes Click to see all.
Purpose π―
Primary purposes and missions the aircraft is designed to fulfillBombardier Q300- Regional RoutesBombardier Q300 is primarily used for Regional Routes. Aircraft optimized for short-distance regional travel Click to see all.
- Island HoppingBombardier Q300 is primarily used for Island Hopping.
ATR 42-300- Short-HaulATR 42-300 is primarily used for Short-Haul.
- Remote AccessATR 42-300 is primarily used for Remote Access. Aircraft capable of operating in remote and challenging locations Click to see all.
ATR 42-500- Short HopsATR 42-500 is primarily used for Short Hops.
- Remote AccessATR 42-500 is primarily used for Remote Access. Aircraft capable of operating in remote and challenging locations Click to see all.
Features Comparison
Known For π‘
Distinctive characteristic or notable feature of the aircraftBombardier Q300- Noise ReductionBombardier Q300 is known for Noise Reduction.
- EfficiencyBombardier Q300 is known for Efficiency.
ATR 42-300- Fuel EconomyATR 42-300 is known for Fuel Economy.
- ReliabilityATR 42-300 is known for Reliability.
ATR 42-500- Fuel EconomyATR 42-500 is known for Fuel Economy.
Pros β
Key advantages and strong points of the aircraftBombardier Q300- Low Operating Costs
- Short Runway CapableAircraft designed for operations on compact runways Click to see all.
ATR 42-300- Economical Operation
- Simple MaintenanceAircraft designed for easy maintenance procedures Click to see all.
ATR 42-500- Low Operating Costs
- Short Runway CapableAircraft designed for operations on compact runways Click to see all.
- Reliable
Cons β
Main disadvantages or limitations of the aircraftBombardier Q300- Weather SensitivityAircraft requiring specific weather conditions for safe operation Click to see all.
- Limited RangeAircraft that can only operate on shorter routes due to fuel capacity or efficiency limitations Click to see all.
ATR 42-300- Speed Limitations
- Capacity Constraints
ATR 42-500
Ratings Comparison
Reliability Score π§
Reliability rating based on maintenance records and operational historyBombardier Q300ATR 42-300ATR 42-500Comfort Score π±
Passenger comfort rating considering cabin design and amenitiesBombardier Q300ATR 42-300ATR 42-500Safety Score π‘
Safety rating based on accident history and safety featuresBombardier Q300ATR 42-300ATR 42-500
Alternatives to Bombardier Q300
ATR 72-700
Known for Fuel Efficient Turbopropπ₯ has more seats than Bombardier Q300
π flies longer than Bombardier Q300
β½ is more fuel efficient than Bombardier Q300
π± is more comfortable than Bombardier Q300
ATR 72-200
Known for Fuel Economy,Reliabilityπ₯ has more seats than Bombardier Q300
β½ is more fuel efficient than Bombardier Q300
π± is more comfortable than Bombardier Q300
β³ is more durable than Bombardier Q300
ATR 72-400
Known for Cost Effectivenessπ₯ has more seats than Bombardier Q300
π flies longer than Bombardier Q300
β½ is more fuel efficient than Bombardier Q300
Embraer E170
Known for Efficiencyπ₯ has more seats than Bombardier Q300
π flies longer than Bombardier Q300
π flies higher than Bombardier Q300
π± is more comfortable than Bombardier Q300
Airbus A220-100
Known for Efficiency,Quiet Operationπ₯ has more seats than Bombardier Q300
π flies longer than Bombardier Q300
β½ is more fuel efficient than Bombardier Q300
π flies higher than Bombardier Q300
π± is more comfortable than Bombardier Q300
π‘ is safer than Bombardier Q300
β is better overall than Bombardier Q300
Airbus A220-300
Known for Fuel Efficiency,Modern Designπ₯ has more seats than Bombardier Q300
π flies longer than Bombardier Q300
π flies higher than Bombardier Q300
π± is more comfortable than Bombardier Q300
π‘ is safer than Bombardier Q300
β is better overall than Bombardier Q300
ATR 72-500
Known for Fuel Efficiency,Reliabilityπ₯ has more seats than Bombardier Q300
π flies longer than Bombardier Q300
β½ is more fuel efficient than Bombardier Q300
π± is more comfortable than Bombardier Q300
Embraer E190-E1
Known for Efficiency,Reliabilityπ₯ has more seats than Bombardier Q300
π flies longer than Bombardier Q300
π flies higher than Bombardier Q300
π± is more comfortable than Bombardier Q300
β is better overall than Bombardier Q300