Compact mode
Airbus A220-300 vs Bombardier Q300 vs ATR 72-500
Table of content
Basic Information Comparison
Manufacturer π’
The company responsible for designing and manufacturing the aircraft, representing the primary producer of the commercial airplane.Airbus A220-300Bombardier Q300ATR 72-500Engine Type β
A crucial component that defines the aircraft's propulsion system and performance characteristics,determining factors in speed,range and operational capabilities.Airbus A220-300Bombardier Q300ATR 72-500
Performance Comparison
Maximum Range π
The maximum distance the aircraft can fly without refueling, measured in nautical miles.Airbus A220-300Bombardier Q300ATR 72-500Fuel Efficiency β½
Measures how efficiently the aircraft consumes fuel during operation,typically expressed in nautical miles per gallon or fuel burn rate.Airbus A220-300Bombardier Q300ATR 72-500Fuel Efficiency Type β½
Classification of the aircraft's fuel consumption efficiency level,helping operators understand relative efficiency.For all*Maximum Altitude π
The highest altitude at which the aircraft can safely and effectively operate,affecting route planning and operational capabilities.Airbus A220-300Bombardier Q300ATR 72-500Maximum Altitude Type π
Classification of the aircraft's maximum operational altitude capability,categorizing its high-altitude performance.Airbus A220-300Bombardier Q300ATR 72-500
Facts Comparison
Interesting Fact π
Unique historical or technical fact about the aircraftAirbus A220-300- First Airbus aircraft built in USA
Bombardier Q300- Features active noise control system
ATR 72-500- Most popular turboprop in its class
Sarcastic Fact π€£
Humorous or ironic observation about the aircraftAirbus A220-300- Too fancy for a regional jet
Bombardier Q300- The whispering workhorse
ATR 72-500- Slower than driving but more scenic
Commercial Comparison
Specifications Comparison
Seating Capacity π₯
The maximum number of passengers that can be accommodated in the aircraft's standard configuration, determining its operational capacity.Airbus A220-300Bombardier Q300ATR 72-500Seating Capacity Type βοΈ
Classification of aircraft based on their passenger capacity, categorizing them into different operational segments.For all*
General Comparison
For whom π€
Target user groups or organizations that typically operate this aircraft typeAirbus A220-300- Regional AirlinesAirbus A220-300 is primarily operated by Regional Airlines. Aircraft optimized for short to medium regional routes Click to see all.
- Business TravelersAirbus A220-300 is primarily operated by Business Travelers. Aircraft designed with business passenger needs, offering productivity and comfort Click to see all.
Bombardier Q300- Regional CarriersBombardier Q300 is primarily operated by Regional Carriers. Aircraft specialized for regional route operations Click to see all.
- CommutersBombardier Q300 is primarily operated by Commuters. Aircraft designed for frequent short-haul flights, prioritizing efficiency Click to see all.
ATR 72-500- Regional TravelersATR 72-500 is primarily operated by Regional Travelers. Aircraft suitable for frequent regional travel with enhanced comfort features Click to see all.
- Island HoppersATR 72-500 is primarily operated by Island Hoppers.
Purpose π―
Primary purposes and missions the aircraft is designed to fulfillAirbus A220-300- Short-Medium RoutesAirbus A220-300 is primarily used for Short-Medium Routes.
- City HoppingAirbus A220-300 is primarily used for City Hopping. Aircraft suitable for frequent short-distance urban travel Click to see all.
Bombardier Q300- Regional RoutesBombardier Q300 is primarily used for Regional Routes. Aircraft optimized for short-distance regional travel Click to see all.
- Island HoppingBombardier Q300 is primarily used for Island Hopping.
ATR 72-500
Features Comparison
Known For π‘
Distinctive characteristic or notable feature of the aircraftAirbus A220-300- Fuel EfficiencyAirbus A220-300 is known for Fuel Efficiency.
- Modern DesignAirbus A220-300 is known for Modern Design.
Bombardier Q300- Noise ReductionBombardier Q300 is known for Noise Reduction.
- EfficiencyBombardier Q300 is known for Efficiency.
ATR 72-500- Fuel EfficiencyATR 72-500 is known for Fuel Efficiency.
- ReliabilityATR 72-500 is known for Reliability.
Pros β
Key advantages and strong points of the aircraftAirbus A220-300- Quiet CabinAircraft with enhanced noise reduction in passenger cabin Click to see all.
- Advanced Avionics
- Latest TechnologyAircraft incorporating cutting-edge aviation technologies and systems Click to see all.
Bombardier Q300- Low Operating Costs
- Short Runway CapableAircraft designed for operations on compact runways Click to see all.
ATR 72-500Cons β
Main disadvantages or limitations of the aircraftAirbus A220-300- Higher Maintenance Costs
- Limited RangeAircraft that can only operate on shorter routes due to fuel capacity or efficiency limitations Click to see all.
Bombardier Q300- Weather SensitivityAircraft requiring specific weather conditions for safe operation Click to see all.
- Limited RangeAircraft that can only operate on shorter routes due to fuel capacity or efficiency limitations Click to see all.
ATR 72-500
Ratings Comparison
Reliability Score π§
Reliability rating based on maintenance records and operational historyAirbus A220-300Bombardier Q300ATR 72-500Comfort Score π±
Passenger comfort rating considering cabin design and amenitiesAirbus A220-300Bombardier Q300ATR 72-500Safety Score π‘
Safety rating based on accident history and safety featuresAirbus A220-300Bombardier Q300ATR 72-500Buy It For Life β³
Long-term value and durability ratingAirbus A220-300Bombardier Q300ATR 72-500Score β
Overall rating combining all scoring attributesAirbus A220-300Bombardier Q300ATR 72-500
Alternatives to Airbus A220-300
ATR 72-700
Known for Fuel Efficient Turbopropπ₯ has more seats than Bombardier Q300
π flies longer than Bombardier Q300
β½ is more fuel efficient than Bombardier Q300
π± is more comfortable than Bombardier Q300
ATR 42-500
Known for Fuel Economyβ½ is more fuel efficient than Bombardier Q300
ATR 72-400
Known for Cost Effectivenessπ₯ has more seats than Bombardier Q300
π flies longer than Bombardier Q300
β½ is more fuel efficient than Bombardier Q300
ATR 72-200
Known for Fuel Economy,Reliabilityπ₯ has more seats than Bombardier Q300
β½ is more fuel efficient than Bombardier Q300
π± is more comfortable than Bombardier Q300
β³ is more durable than Bombardier Q300
Embraer E170
Known for Efficiencyπ₯ has more seats than Bombardier Q300
π flies longer than Bombardier Q300
π flies higher than Bombardier Q300
π± is more comfortable than Bombardier Q300
Airbus A220-100
Known for Efficiency,Quiet Operationπ₯ has more seats than Bombardier Q300
π flies longer than Bombardier Q300
β½ is more fuel efficient than Bombardier Q300
π flies higher than Bombardier Q300
π± is more comfortable than Bombardier Q300
π‘ is safer than Bombardier Q300
β is better overall than Bombardier Q300
ATR 72-600
Known for Fuel Efficiencyπ₯ has more seats than Bombardier Q300
π flies longer than Bombardier Q300
β½ is more fuel efficient than Bombardier Q300
Embraer E190-E1
Known for Efficiency,Reliabilityπ₯ has more seats than Bombardier Q300
π flies longer than Bombardier Q300
π flies higher than Bombardier Q300
π± is more comfortable than Bombardier Q300
β is better overall than Bombardier Q300