Similar and Alternative Airplanes to ATR 42-500
Categories- Manufacturer 🏢ATRSeating Capacity 👥48 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbopropFuel Efficiency ⛽3.2 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Low Operating Costs, Short Runway Capability, Robust Design, Fuel Efficient and Short Runway CapableCons ➖Limited Speed, Weather Sensitivity, Limited Range and Speed Restrictions🌍 flies longer than ATR 42-500🛡 is safer than ATR 42-500
- Manufacturer 🏢ATRSeating Capacity 👥78 seats 🟢Engine Type ✈TurbopropFuel Efficiency ⛽4.1 nautical miles per gallon 🟢Pros ➕Low Operating Costs, Reliable Performance and Short Runway CapableCons ➖Speed Limitations & Weather Sensitivity🔧 is more reliable than ATR 42-500👥 has more seats than ATR 42-500🌍 flies longer than ATR 42-500⛽ is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-500💱 is more comfortable than ATR 42-500🛡 is safer than ATR 42-500⏳ is more durable than ATR 42-500⭐ is better overall than ATR 42-500
- Manufacturer 🏢ATRSeating Capacity 👥74 seats 🟢Engine Type ✈TurbopropFuel Efficiency ⛽4.5 nautical miles per gallon 🟢Pros ➕Low Operating Costs, Simple Maintenance and Good For Short RunwaysCons ➖Speed Limitations & Weather Sensitive👥 has more seats than ATR 42-500🌍 flies longer than ATR 42-500⛽ is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-500💱 is more comfortable than ATR 42-500🛡 is safer than ATR 42-500⭐ is better overall than ATR 42-500
- Manufacturer 🏢ATRSeating Capacity 👥48 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbopropFuel Efficiency ⛽3.5 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Economical Operation & Simple MaintenanceCons ➖Speed Limitations & Capacity Constraints🔧 is more reliable than ATR 42-500🛡 is safer than ATR 42-500⏳ is more durable than ATR 42-500⭐ is better overall than ATR 42-500
- Manufacturer 🏢ATRSeating Capacity 👥70 seats 🟢Engine Type ✈TurbopropFuel Efficiency ⛽3.4 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Low Operating Costs & Short Runway CapabilityCons ➖Speed Limitations & Weather Sensitivity👥 has more seats than ATR 42-500🌍 flies longer than ATR 42-500🛡 is safer than ATR 42-500
- Manufacturer 🏢ATRSeating Capacity 👥74 seats 🟢Engine Type ✈TurbopropFuel Efficiency ⛽4.1 nautical miles per gallon 🟢Pros ➕Low Operating Costs & Short Runway CapabilityCons ➖Speed Limitations & Weather Sensitivity🔧 is more reliable than ATR 42-500👥 has more seats than ATR 42-500🌍 flies longer than ATR 42-500⛽ is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-500💱 is more comfortable than ATR 42-500🛡 is safer than ATR 42-500⏳ is more durable than ATR 42-500⭐ is better overall than ATR 42-500
- Manufacturer 🏢ATRSeating Capacity 👥78 seats 🟢Engine Type ✈TurbopropFuel Efficiency ⛽4.1 nautical miles per gallon 🟢Pros ➕Economic Operations & ReliabilityCons ➖Speed Limitations & Weather Sensitivity🔧 is more reliable than ATR 42-500👥 has more seats than ATR 42-500🌍 flies longer than ATR 42-500⛽ is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-500🛡 is safer than ATR 42-500⏳ is more durable than ATR 42-500⭐ is better overall than ATR 42-500
- Manufacturer 🏢BombardierSeating Capacity 👥50 seats 🟢Engine Type ✈TurbopropFuel Efficiency ⛽3.2 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Low Operating Costs & Short Runway CapableCons ➖Weather Sensitivity & Limited Range🔧 is more reliable than ATR 42-500👥 has more seats than ATR 42-500🌍 flies longer than ATR 42-500💱 is more comfortable than ATR 42-500🛡 is safer than ATR 42-500⏳ is more durable than ATR 42-500⭐ is better overall than ATR 42-500
- Manufacturer 🏢SaabSeating Capacity 👥34 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbopropFuel Efficiency ⛽3 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Low Operating Costs & DurabilityCons ➖Limited Range & Small Capacity🔧 is more reliable than ATR 42-500🌍 flies longer than ATR 42-500🛡 is safer than ATR 42-500⏳ is more durable than ATR 42-500⭐ is better overall than ATR 42-500
- Manufacturer 🏢AirbusSeating Capacity 👥195 seats 🟢Engine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽3.8 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Low Operating Costs & ReliableCons ➖Limited Range & Cabin Width🔧 is more reliable than ATR 42-500👥 has more seats than ATR 42-500🌍 flies longer than ATR 42-500🚀 flies higher than ATR 42-500💱 is more comfortable than ATR 42-500🛡 is safer than ATR 42-500⏳ is more durable than ATR 42-500⭐ is better overall than ATR 42-500
- ATR 42-600
- ATR 42-600 is manufactured by ATR. 👉 undefined.
- ATR 42-600 can accommodate 48 seats passengers. 👉 ATR 42-500 has same number of seats as ATR 42-600.
- The ATR 42-600 is equipped with Turboprop. 👉 undefined.
- The fuel efficiency of ATR 42-600 is 3.2 nautical miles per gallon nautical miles per gallon. 👎 ATR 42-500 is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-600.
- The price of ATR 42-600 is 20000000 USD. 👉 ATR 42-500 costs same as ATR 42-600.
- ATR 72-700
- ATR 72-700 is manufactured by ATR. 👉 undefined.
- ATR 72-700 can accommodate 78 seats passengers. 👍 ATR 72-700 has more seats than ATR 42-500.
- The ATR 72-700 is equipped with Turboprop. 👉 undefined.
- The fuel efficiency of ATR 72-700 is 4.1 nautical miles per gallon nautical miles per gallon. 👍 ATR 72-700 is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-500.
- The price of ATR 72-700 is 26000000 USD. 👍 ATR 72-700 is cheaper than ATR 42-500.
- ATR 72-500
- ATR 72-500 is manufactured by ATR. 👉 undefined.
- ATR 72-500 can accommodate 74 seats passengers. 👍 ATR 72-500 has more seats than ATR 42-500.
- The ATR 72-500 is equipped with Turboprop. 👉 undefined.
- The fuel efficiency of ATR 72-500 is 4.5 nautical miles per gallon nautical miles per gallon. 👍 ATR 72-500 is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-500.
- The price of ATR 72-500 is 26000000 USD. 👍 ATR 72-500 is cheaper than ATR 42-500.
- ATR 42-300
- ATR 42-300 is manufactured by ATR. 👉 undefined.
- ATR 42-300 can accommodate 48 seats passengers. 👉 ATR 42-500 has same number of seats as ATR 42-300.
- The ATR 42-300 is equipped with Turboprop. 👉 undefined.
- The fuel efficiency of ATR 42-300 is 3.5 nautical miles per gallon nautical miles per gallon. 👎 ATR 42-500 is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-300.
- The price of ATR 42-300 is 12000000 USD. 👎 ATR 42-500 is cheaper than ATR 42-300.
- ATR 72-400
- ATR 72-400 is manufactured by ATR. 👉 undefined.
- ATR 72-400 can accommodate 70 seats passengers. 👍 ATR 72-400 has more seats than ATR 42-500.
- The ATR 72-400 is equipped with Turboprop. 👉 undefined.
- The fuel efficiency of ATR 72-400 is 3.4 nautical miles per gallon nautical miles per gallon. 👎 ATR 42-500 is more fuel efficient than ATR 72-400.
- The price of ATR 72-400 is 26000000 USD. 👍 ATR 72-400 is cheaper than ATR 42-500.
- ATR 72-200
- ATR 72-200 is manufactured by ATR. 👉 undefined.
- ATR 72-200 can accommodate 74 seats passengers. 👍 ATR 72-200 has more seats than ATR 42-500.
- The ATR 72-200 is equipped with Turboprop. 👉 undefined.
- The fuel efficiency of ATR 72-200 is 4.1 nautical miles per gallon nautical miles per gallon. 👍 ATR 72-200 is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-500.
- The price of ATR 72-200 is 26000000 USD. 👍 ATR 72-200 is cheaper than ATR 42-500.
- ATR 72-600
- ATR 72-600 is manufactured by ATR. 👉 undefined.
- ATR 72-600 can accommodate 78 seats passengers. 👍 ATR 72-600 has more seats than ATR 42-500.
- The ATR 72-600 is equipped with Turboprop. 👉 undefined.
- The fuel efficiency of ATR 72-600 is 4.1 nautical miles per gallon nautical miles per gallon. 👍 ATR 72-600 is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-500.
- The price of ATR 72-600 is 26000000 USD. 👍 ATR 72-600 is cheaper than ATR 42-500.
- Bombardier Q300
- Bombardier Q300 is manufactured by Bombardier. 👍 undefined.
- Bombardier Q300 can accommodate 50 seats passengers. 👍 Bombardier Q300 has more seats than ATR 42-500.
- The Bombardier Q300 is equipped with Turboprop. 👉 undefined.
- The fuel efficiency of Bombardier Q300 is 3.2 nautical miles per gallon nautical miles per gallon. 👎 ATR 42-500 is more fuel efficient than Bombardier Q300.
- The price of Bombardier Q300 is 20000000 USD. 👉 ATR 42-500 costs same as Bombardier Q300.
- Saab 340
- Saab 340 is manufactured by Saab. 👍 undefined.
- Saab 340 can accommodate 34 seats passengers. 👎 ATR 42-500 has more seats than Saab 340.
- The Saab 340 is equipped with Turboprop. 👉 undefined.
- The fuel efficiency of Saab 340 is 3 nautical miles per gallon nautical miles per gallon. 👎 ATR 42-500 is more fuel efficient than Saab 340.
- The price of Saab 340 is 15000000 USD. 👎 ATR 42-500 is cheaper than Saab 340.
- Airbus A320neo
- Airbus A320neo is manufactured by Airbus. 👍 undefined.
- Airbus A320neo can accommodate 195 seats passengers. 👍 Airbus A320neo has more seats than ATR 42-500.
- The Airbus A320neo is equipped with Turbofan.
- The fuel efficiency of Airbus A320neo is 3.8 nautical miles per gallon nautical miles per gallon. 👉 ATR 42-500 has same fuel efficiency as Airbus A320neo.
- The price of Airbus A320neo is 110500000 USD. 👍 Airbus A320neo is cheaper than ATR 42-500.