Similar and Alternative Airplanes to ATR 72-400
Categories- Manufacturer 🏢ATRSeating Capacity 👥48 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbopropFuel Efficiency ⛽3.2 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Low Operating Costs, Short Runway Capability, Robust Design, Fuel Efficient and Short Runway CapableCons ➖Limited Speed, Weather Sensitivity, Limited Range and Speed Restrictions🛡 is safer than ATR 72-400⏳ is more durable than ATR 72-400
- Manufacturer 🏢ATRSeating Capacity 👥74 seats 🟢Engine Type ✈TurbopropFuel Efficiency ⛽4.1 nautical miles per gallon 🟢Pros ➕Low Operating Costs & Short Runway CapabilityCons ➖Speed Limitations & Weather Sensitivity🔧 is more reliable than ATR 72-400👥 has more seats than ATR 72-400⛽ is more fuel efficient than ATR 72-400💱 is more comfortable than ATR 72-400🛡 is safer than ATR 72-400⏳ is more durable than ATR 72-400⭐ is better overall than ATR 72-400
- Manufacturer 🏢ATRSeating Capacity 👥74 seats 🟢Engine Type ✈TurbopropFuel Efficiency ⛽4.5 nautical miles per gallon 🟢Pros ➕Low Operating Costs, Simple Maintenance and Good For Short RunwaysCons ➖Speed Limitations & Weather Sensitive👥 has more seats than ATR 72-400⛽ is more fuel efficient than ATR 72-400💱 is more comfortable than ATR 72-400⏳ is more durable than ATR 72-400⭐ is better overall than ATR 72-400
- Manufacturer 🏢ATRSeating Capacity 👥78 seats 🟢Engine Type ✈TurbopropFuel Efficiency ⛽4.1 nautical miles per gallon 🟢Pros ➕Low Operating Costs, Reliable Performance and Short Runway CapableCons ➖Speed Limitations & Weather Sensitivity🔧 is more reliable than ATR 72-400👥 has more seats than ATR 72-400⛽ is more fuel efficient than ATR 72-400💱 is more comfortable than ATR 72-400🛡 is safer than ATR 72-400⏳ is more durable than ATR 72-400⭐ is better overall than ATR 72-400
- Manufacturer 🏢ATRSeating Capacity 👥48 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbopropFuel Efficiency ⛽3.8 nautical miles per gallon 🟢Pros ➕Low Operating Costs, Short Runway Capable and ReliableCons ➖Speed Limitations & Weather Sensitive⛽ is more fuel efficient than ATR 72-400💱 is more comfortable than ATR 72-400⏳ is more durable than ATR 72-400⭐ is better overall than ATR 72-400
- Manufacturer 🏢ATRSeating Capacity 👥78 seats 🟢Engine Type ✈TurbopropFuel Efficiency ⛽4.1 nautical miles per gallon 🟢Pros ➕Economic Operations & ReliabilityCons ➖Speed Limitations & Weather Sensitivity🔧 is more reliable than ATR 72-400👥 has more seats than ATR 72-400⛽ is more fuel efficient than ATR 72-400💱 is more comfortable than ATR 72-400🛡 is safer than ATR 72-400⏳ is more durable than ATR 72-400⭐ is better overall than ATR 72-400
- Manufacturer 🏢ATRSeating Capacity 👥48 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbopropFuel Efficiency ⛽3.5 nautical miles per gallon 🟢Pros ➕Economical Operation & Simple MaintenanceCons ➖Speed Limitations & Capacity Constraints🔧 is more reliable than ATR 72-400⛽ is more fuel efficient than ATR 72-400🛡 is safer than ATR 72-400⏳ is more durable than ATR 72-400⭐ is better overall than ATR 72-400
- Manufacturer 🏢BombardierSeating Capacity 👥50 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbopropFuel Efficiency ⛽3.2 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Low Operating Costs & Short Runway CapableCons ➖Weather Sensitivity & Limited Range🔧 is more reliable than ATR 72-400💱 is more comfortable than ATR 72-400🛡 is safer than ATR 72-400⏳ is more durable than ATR 72-400⭐ is better overall than ATR 72-400
- Manufacturer 🏢SaabSeating Capacity 👥34 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbopropFuel Efficiency ⛽3 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Low Operating Costs & DurabilityCons ➖Limited Range & Small Capacity🔧 is more reliable than ATR 72-400💱 is more comfortable than ATR 72-400🛡 is safer than ATR 72-400⏳ is more durable than ATR 72-400⭐ is better overall than ATR 72-400
- Manufacturer 🏢AirbusSeating Capacity 👥160 seats 🟢Engine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽3.4 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Low Operating Costs, Advanced Cockpit and Passenger ComfortCons ➖Limited Cargo Space & Range Restrictions🔧 is more reliable than ATR 72-400👥 has more seats than ATR 72-400🌍 flies longer than ATR 72-400🚀 flies higher than ATR 72-400💱 is more comfortable than ATR 72-400🛡 is safer than ATR 72-400⏳ is more durable than ATR 72-400⭐ is better overall than ATR 72-400
- ATR 42-600
- ATR 42-600 is manufactured by ATR. 👉 undefined.
- ATR 42-600 can accommodate 48 seats passengers. 👎 ATR 72-400 has more seats than ATR 42-600.
- The ATR 42-600 is equipped with Turboprop. 👉 undefined.
- The fuel efficiency of ATR 42-600 is 3.2 nautical miles per gallon nautical miles per gallon. 👎 ATR 72-400 is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-600.
- The price of ATR 42-600 is 20000000 USD. 👎 ATR 72-400 is cheaper than ATR 42-600.
- ATR 72-200
- ATR 72-200 is manufactured by ATR. 👉 undefined.
- ATR 72-200 can accommodate 74 seats passengers. 👍 ATR 72-200 has more seats than ATR 72-400.
- The ATR 72-200 is equipped with Turboprop. 👉 undefined.
- The fuel efficiency of ATR 72-200 is 4.1 nautical miles per gallon nautical miles per gallon. 👍 ATR 72-200 is more fuel efficient than ATR 72-400.
- The price of ATR 72-200 is 26000000 USD. 👉 ATR 72-400 costs same as ATR 72-200.
- ATR 72-500
- ATR 72-500 is manufactured by ATR. 👉 undefined.
- ATR 72-500 can accommodate 74 seats passengers. 👍 ATR 72-500 has more seats than ATR 72-400.
- The ATR 72-500 is equipped with Turboprop. 👉 undefined.
- The fuel efficiency of ATR 72-500 is 4.5 nautical miles per gallon nautical miles per gallon. 👍 ATR 72-500 is more fuel efficient than ATR 72-400.
- The price of ATR 72-500 is 26000000 USD. 👉 ATR 72-400 costs same as ATR 72-500.
- ATR 72-700
- ATR 72-700 is manufactured by ATR. 👉 undefined.
- ATR 72-700 can accommodate 78 seats passengers. 👍 ATR 72-700 has more seats than ATR 72-400.
- The ATR 72-700 is equipped with Turboprop. 👉 undefined.
- The fuel efficiency of ATR 72-700 is 4.1 nautical miles per gallon nautical miles per gallon. 👍 ATR 72-700 is more fuel efficient than ATR 72-400.
- The price of ATR 72-700 is 26000000 USD. 👉 ATR 72-400 costs same as ATR 72-700.
- ATR 42-500
- ATR 42-500 is manufactured by ATR. 👉 undefined.
- ATR 42-500 can accommodate 48 seats passengers. 👎 ATR 72-400 has more seats than ATR 42-500.
- The ATR 42-500 is equipped with Turboprop. 👉 undefined.
- The fuel efficiency of ATR 42-500 is 3.8 nautical miles per gallon nautical miles per gallon. 👍 ATR 42-500 is more fuel efficient than ATR 72-400.
- The price of ATR 42-500 is 20000000 USD. 👎 ATR 72-400 is cheaper than ATR 42-500.
- ATR 72-600
- ATR 72-600 is manufactured by ATR. 👉 undefined.
- ATR 72-600 can accommodate 78 seats passengers. 👍 ATR 72-600 has more seats than ATR 72-400.
- The ATR 72-600 is equipped with Turboprop. 👉 undefined.
- The fuel efficiency of ATR 72-600 is 4.1 nautical miles per gallon nautical miles per gallon. 👍 ATR 72-600 is more fuel efficient than ATR 72-400.
- The price of ATR 72-600 is 26000000 USD. 👉 ATR 72-400 costs same as ATR 72-600.
- ATR 42-300
- ATR 42-300 is manufactured by ATR. 👉 undefined.
- ATR 42-300 can accommodate 48 seats passengers. 👎 ATR 72-400 has more seats than ATR 42-300.
- The ATR 42-300 is equipped with Turboprop. 👉 undefined.
- The fuel efficiency of ATR 42-300 is 3.5 nautical miles per gallon nautical miles per gallon. 👍 ATR 42-300 is more fuel efficient than ATR 72-400.
- The price of ATR 42-300 is 12000000 USD. 👎 ATR 72-400 is cheaper than ATR 42-300.
- Bombardier Q300
- Bombardier Q300 is manufactured by Bombardier. 👍 undefined.
- Bombardier Q300 can accommodate 50 seats passengers. 👎 ATR 72-400 has more seats than Bombardier Q300.
- The Bombardier Q300 is equipped with Turboprop. 👉 undefined.
- The fuel efficiency of Bombardier Q300 is 3.2 nautical miles per gallon nautical miles per gallon. 👎 ATR 72-400 is more fuel efficient than Bombardier Q300.
- The price of Bombardier Q300 is 20000000 USD. 👎 ATR 72-400 is cheaper than Bombardier Q300.
- Saab 340
- Saab 340 is manufactured by Saab. 👍 undefined.
- Saab 340 can accommodate 34 seats passengers. 👎 ATR 72-400 has more seats than Saab 340.
- The Saab 340 is equipped with Turboprop. 👉 undefined.
- The fuel efficiency of Saab 340 is 3 nautical miles per gallon nautical miles per gallon. 👎 ATR 72-400 is more fuel efficient than Saab 340.
- The price of Saab 340 is 15000000 USD. 👎 ATR 72-400 is cheaper than Saab 340.
- Airbus A220-500
- Airbus A220-500 is manufactured by Airbus. 👍 undefined.
- Airbus A220-500 can accommodate 160 seats passengers. 👍 Airbus A220-500 has more seats than ATR 72-400.
- The Airbus A220-500 is equipped with Turbofan.
- The fuel efficiency of Airbus A220-500 is 3.4 nautical miles per gallon nautical miles per gallon. 👉 ATR 72-400 has same fuel efficiency as Airbus A220-500.
- The price of Airbus A220-500 is 91000000 USD. 👍 Airbus A220-500 is cheaper than ATR 72-400.