Similar and Alternative Airplanes to ATR 72-600
Categories- Manufacturer 🏢ATRSeating Capacity 👥78 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbopropFuel Efficiency ⛽4.1 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Low Operating Costs, Reliable Performance and Short Runway CapableCons ➖Speed Limitations & Weather Sensitivity💱 is more comfortable than ATR 72-600🛡 is safer than ATR 72-600⏳ is more durable than ATR 72-600⭐ is better overall than ATR 72-600
- Manufacturer 🏢ATRSeating Capacity 👥74 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbopropFuel Efficiency ⛽4.5 nautical miles per gallon 🟢Pros ➕Low Operating Costs, Simple Maintenance and Good For Short RunwaysCons ➖Speed Limitations & Weather Sensitive🌍 flies longer than ATR 72-600⛽ is more fuel efficient than ATR 72-600💱 is more comfortable than ATR 72-600
- Manufacturer 🏢ATRSeating Capacity 👥74 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbopropFuel Efficiency ⛽4.1 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Low Operating Costs & Short Runway CapabilityCons ➖Speed Limitations & Weather Sensitivity💱 is more comfortable than ATR 72-600⏳ is more durable than ATR 72-600⭐ is better overall than ATR 72-600
- Manufacturer 🏢ATRSeating Capacity 👥48 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbopropFuel Efficiency ⛽3.2 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Low Operating Costs, Short Runway Capability, Robust Design, Fuel Efficient and Short Runway CapableCons ➖Limited Speed, Weather Sensitivity, Limited Range and Speed Restrictions
- Manufacturer 🏢ATRSeating Capacity 👥70 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbopropFuel Efficiency ⛽3.4 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Low Operating Costs & Short Runway CapabilityCons ➖Speed Limitations & Weather Sensitivity🌍 flies longer than ATR 72-600
- Manufacturer 🏢ATRSeating Capacity 👥48 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbopropFuel Efficiency ⛽3.5 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Economical Operation & Simple MaintenanceCons ➖Speed Limitations & Capacity Constraints⏳ is more durable than ATR 72-600
- Manufacturer 🏢ATRSeating Capacity 👥48 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbopropFuel Efficiency ⛽3.8 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Low Operating Costs, Short Runway Capable and ReliableCons ➖Speed Limitations & Weather Sensitive
- Manufacturer 🏢BombardierSeating Capacity 👥50 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbopropFuel Efficiency ⛽3.2 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Low Operating Costs & Short Runway CapableCons ➖Weather Sensitivity & Limited Range🔧 is more reliable than ATR 72-600💱 is more comfortable than ATR 72-600🛡 is safer than ATR 72-600⏳ is more durable than ATR 72-600⭐ is better overall than ATR 72-600
- Manufacturer 🏢EmbraerSeating Capacity 👥37 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽2.8 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Economic Operation & Easy MaintenanceCons ➖Limited Passenger Space & Range Restrictions🌍 flies longer than ATR 72-600🚀 flies higher than ATR 72-600🛡 is safer than ATR 72-600⭐ is better overall than ATR 72-600
- Manufacturer 🏢AirbusSeating Capacity 👥244 seats 🟢Engine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽4.1 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Extended Range, Fuel Efficiency and Lower Operating CostsCons ➖Limited Cargo Capacity & New Aircraft Type👥 has more seats than ATR 72-600🌍 flies longer than ATR 72-600🚀 flies higher than ATR 72-600💱 is more comfortable than ATR 72-600🛡 is safer than ATR 72-600⭐ is better overall than ATR 72-600
- ATR 72-700
- ATR 72-700 is manufactured by ATR. 👉 undefined.
- ATR 72-700 can accommodate 78 seats passengers. 👉 ATR 72-600 has same number of seats as ATR 72-700.
- The ATR 72-700 is equipped with Turboprop. 👉 undefined.
- The fuel efficiency of ATR 72-700 is 4.1 nautical miles per gallon nautical miles per gallon. 👉 ATR 72-600 has same fuel efficiency as ATR 72-700.
- The price of ATR 72-700 is 26000000 USD. 👉 ATR 72-600 costs same as ATR 72-700.
- ATR 72-500
- ATR 72-500 is manufactured by ATR. 👉 undefined.
- ATR 72-500 can accommodate 74 seats passengers. 👎 ATR 72-600 has more seats than ATR 72-500.
- The ATR 72-500 is equipped with Turboprop. 👉 undefined.
- The fuel efficiency of ATR 72-500 is 4.5 nautical miles per gallon nautical miles per gallon. 👍 ATR 72-500 is more fuel efficient than ATR 72-600.
- The price of ATR 72-500 is 26000000 USD. 👉 ATR 72-600 costs same as ATR 72-500.
- ATR 72-200
- ATR 72-200 is manufactured by ATR. 👉 undefined.
- ATR 72-200 can accommodate 74 seats passengers. 👎 ATR 72-600 has more seats than ATR 72-200.
- The ATR 72-200 is equipped with Turboprop. 👉 undefined.
- The fuel efficiency of ATR 72-200 is 4.1 nautical miles per gallon nautical miles per gallon. 👉 ATR 72-600 has same fuel efficiency as ATR 72-200.
- The price of ATR 72-200 is 26000000 USD. 👉 ATR 72-600 costs same as ATR 72-200.
- ATR 42-600
- ATR 42-600 is manufactured by ATR. 👉 undefined.
- ATR 42-600 can accommodate 48 seats passengers. 👎 ATR 72-600 has more seats than ATR 42-600.
- The ATR 42-600 is equipped with Turboprop. 👉 undefined.
- The fuel efficiency of ATR 42-600 is 3.2 nautical miles per gallon nautical miles per gallon. 👎 ATR 72-600 is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-600.
- The price of ATR 42-600 is 20000000 USD. 👎 ATR 72-600 is cheaper than ATR 42-600.
- ATR 72-400
- ATR 72-400 is manufactured by ATR. 👉 undefined.
- ATR 72-400 can accommodate 70 seats passengers. 👎 ATR 72-600 has more seats than ATR 72-400.
- The ATR 72-400 is equipped with Turboprop. 👉 undefined.
- The fuel efficiency of ATR 72-400 is 3.4 nautical miles per gallon nautical miles per gallon. 👎 ATR 72-600 is more fuel efficient than ATR 72-400.
- The price of ATR 72-400 is 26000000 USD. 👉 ATR 72-600 costs same as ATR 72-400.
- ATR 42-300
- ATR 42-300 is manufactured by ATR. 👉 undefined.
- ATR 42-300 can accommodate 48 seats passengers. 👎 ATR 72-600 has more seats than ATR 42-300.
- The ATR 42-300 is equipped with Turboprop. 👉 undefined.
- The fuel efficiency of ATR 42-300 is 3.5 nautical miles per gallon nautical miles per gallon. 👎 ATR 72-600 is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-300.
- The price of ATR 42-300 is 12000000 USD. 👎 ATR 72-600 is cheaper than ATR 42-300.
- ATR 42-500
- ATR 42-500 is manufactured by ATR. 👉 undefined.
- ATR 42-500 can accommodate 48 seats passengers. 👎 ATR 72-600 has more seats than ATR 42-500.
- The ATR 42-500 is equipped with Turboprop. 👉 undefined.
- The fuel efficiency of ATR 42-500 is 3.8 nautical miles per gallon nautical miles per gallon. 👎 ATR 72-600 is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-500.
- The price of ATR 42-500 is 20000000 USD. 👎 ATR 72-600 is cheaper than ATR 42-500.
- Bombardier Q300
- Bombardier Q300 is manufactured by Bombardier. 👍 undefined.
- Bombardier Q300 can accommodate 50 seats passengers. 👎 ATR 72-600 has more seats than Bombardier Q300.
- The Bombardier Q300 is equipped with Turboprop. 👉 undefined.
- The fuel efficiency of Bombardier Q300 is 3.2 nautical miles per gallon nautical miles per gallon. 👎 ATR 72-600 is more fuel efficient than Bombardier Q300.
- The price of Bombardier Q300 is 20000000 USD. 👎 ATR 72-600 is cheaper than Bombardier Q300.
- Embraer ERJ-135
- Embraer ERJ-135 is manufactured by Embraer. 👍 undefined.
- Embraer ERJ-135 can accommodate 37 seats passengers. 👎 ATR 72-600 has more seats than Embraer ERJ-135.
- The Embraer ERJ-135 is equipped with Turbofan.
- The fuel efficiency of Embraer ERJ-135 is 2.8 nautical miles per gallon nautical miles per gallon. 👎 ATR 72-600 is more fuel efficient than Embraer ERJ-135.
- The price of Embraer ERJ-135 is 25000000 USD. 👎 ATR 72-600 is cheaper than Embraer ERJ-135.
- Airbus A321XLR
- Airbus A321XLR is manufactured by Airbus. 👍 undefined.
- Airbus A321XLR can accommodate 244 seats passengers. 👍 Airbus A321XLR has more seats than ATR 72-600.
- The Airbus A321XLR is equipped with Turbofan.
- The fuel efficiency of Airbus A321XLR is 4.1 nautical miles per gallon nautical miles per gallon. 👉 ATR 72-600 has same fuel efficiency as Airbus A321XLR.
- The price of Airbus A321XLR is 142000000 USD. 👍 Airbus A321XLR is cheaper than ATR 72-600.