10 Best Alternatives to Comac C919 Airplane
Categories- Manufacturer 🏢AirbusSeating Capacity 👥180 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽3.5 nautical miles per gallon 🟢Pros ➕Proven Track Record, Cost-Effective and Wide Operator BaseCons ➖Older Technology & Limited Range🔧 is more reliable than Comac C919🌍 flies longer than Comac C919⛽ is more fuel efficient than Comac C919💱 is more comfortable than Comac C919🛡 is safer than Comac C919⏳ is more durable than Comac C919⭐ is better overall than Comac C919
- Manufacturer 🏢TupolevSeating Capacity 👥180 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽1.8 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Robust Construction, Short Field Capable and All-Weather OperationsCons ➖High Fuel Consumption, Noise Levels and Maintenance Intensive🛡 is safer than Comac C919
- Manufacturer 🏢COMACSeating Capacity 👥90 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽1.6 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Low Acquisition Cost & Domestic SupportCons ➖Limited International Presence & Newer Technology🛡 is safer than Comac C919⭐ is better overall than Comac C919
- Manufacturer 🏢AirbusSeating Capacity 👥180 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽3.1 nautical miles per gallon 🟢Pros ➕Fuel Efficient, Low Operating Costs, Reliable and CommonalityCons ➖Limited Range, Cabin Width and Overhead Space🔧 is more reliable than Comac C919🌍 flies longer than Comac C919⛽ is more fuel efficient than Comac C919💱 is more comfortable than Comac C919🛡 is safer than Comac C919⏳ is more durable than Comac C919⭐ is better overall than Comac C919
- Manufacturer 🏢AirbusSeating Capacity 👥150 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽2.8 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Fuel Efficient, Easy Maintenance and Common Type RatingCons ➖Limited Range & Older Technology🔧 is more reliable than Comac C919🌍 flies longer than Comac C919💱 is more comfortable than Comac C919🛡 is safer than Comac C919⏳ is more durable than Comac C919⭐ is better overall than Comac C919
- Manufacturer 🏢BombardierSeating Capacity 👥100 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽1.8 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Excellent Fuel Efficiency & Low Operating CostsCons ➖Limited Cargo Space & Range Limitations🔧 is more reliable than Comac C919🚀 flies higher than Comac C919🛡 is safer than Comac C919⏳ is more durable than Comac C919⭐ is better overall than Comac C919
- Manufacturer 🏢AirbusSeating Capacity 👥160 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽3 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Low Operating Costs, Commonality With A320 Family and Easy MaintenanceCons ➖Limited Cargo Capacity & Range Restrictions🔧 is more reliable than Comac C919🌍 flies longer than Comac C919💱 is more comfortable than Comac C919🛡 is safer than Comac C919⏳ is more durable than Comac C919⭐ is better overall than Comac C919
- Manufacturer 🏢AirbusSeating Capacity 👥135 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽3.8 nautical miles per gallon 🟢Pros ➕Low Operating Costs, Superior Comfort and Quiet CabinCons ➖Limited Range & Smaller Capacity🔧 is more reliable than Comac C919🌍 flies longer than Comac C919⛽ is more fuel efficient than Comac C919💱 is more comfortable than Comac C919🛡 is safer than Comac C919⏳ is more durable than Comac C919⭐ is better overall than Comac C919
- Manufacturer 🏢EmbraerSeating Capacity 👥76 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽2.8 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Excellent Fuel Economy, Low Operating Costs and Quiet CabinCons ➖Limited Range For Longer Routes & Small Cargo Capacity🔧 is more reliable than Comac C919🚀 flies higher than Comac C919💱 is more comfortable than Comac C919🛡 is safer than Comac C919⏳ is more durable than Comac C919⭐ is better overall than Comac C919
- Manufacturer 🏢AirbusSeating Capacity 👥132 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽2.9 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Easy Maintenance, Good Economics and Airport FlexibilityCons ➖Limited Range, Small Capacity and Limited Market Success🔧 is more reliable than Comac C919🌍 flies longer than Comac C919🚀 flies higher than Comac C919💱 is more comfortable than Comac C919🛡 is safer than Comac C919⏳ is more durable than Comac C919⭐ is better overall than Comac C919
- Airbus A320ceo
- Airbus A320ceo is manufactured by Airbus.
- Airbus A320ceo can accommodate 180 seats passengers. 👎 Comac C919 has more seats than Airbus A320ceo.
- The Airbus A320ceo is equipped with Turbofan. 👉 undefined.
- The fuel efficiency of Airbus A320ceo is 3.5 nautical miles per gallon nautical miles per gallon. 👍 Airbus A320ceo is more fuel efficient than Comac C919.
- The price of Airbus A320ceo is 101000000 USD. 👍 Airbus A320ceo is cheaper than Comac C919.
- Tupolev Tu-154
- Tupolev Tu-154 is manufactured by Tupolev. 👍 undefined.
- Tupolev Tu-154 can accommodate 180 seats passengers. 👎 Comac C919 has more seats than Tupolev Tu-154.
- The Tupolev Tu-154 is equipped with Turbofan. 👉 undefined.
- The fuel efficiency of Tupolev Tu-154 is 1.8 nautical miles per gallon nautical miles per gallon. 👎 Comac C919 is more fuel efficient than Tupolev Tu-154.
- The price of Tupolev Tu-154 is 45000000 USD. 👎 Comac C919 is cheaper than Tupolev Tu-154.
- COMAC ARJ21
- COMAC ARJ21 is manufactured by COMAC.
- COMAC ARJ21 can accommodate 90 seats passengers. 👎 Comac C919 has more seats than COMAC ARJ21.
- The COMAC ARJ21 is equipped with Turbofan. 👉 undefined.
- The fuel efficiency of COMAC ARJ21 is 1.6 nautical miles per gallon nautical miles per gallon. 👎 Comac C919 is more fuel efficient than COMAC ARJ21.
- The price of COMAC ARJ21 is 38000000 USD. 👎 Comac C919 is cheaper than COMAC ARJ21.
- Airbus A320
- Airbus A320 is manufactured by Airbus.
- Airbus A320 can accommodate 180 seats passengers. 👎 Comac C919 has more seats than Airbus A320.
- The Airbus A320 is equipped with Turbofan. 👉 undefined.
- The fuel efficiency of Airbus A320 is 3.1 nautical miles per gallon nautical miles per gallon. 👍 Airbus A320 is more fuel efficient than Comac C919.
- The price of Airbus A320 is 98000000 USD. 👎 Comac C919 is cheaper than Airbus A320.
- Airbus A320-100
- Airbus A320-100 is manufactured by Airbus.
- Airbus A320-100 can accommodate 150 seats passengers. 👎 Comac C919 has more seats than Airbus A320-100.
- The Airbus A320-100 is equipped with Turbofan. 👉 undefined.
- The fuel efficiency of Airbus A320-100 is 2.8 nautical miles per gallon nautical miles per gallon. 👎 Comac C919 is more fuel efficient than Airbus A320-100.
- The price of Airbus A320-100 is 85000000 USD. 👎 Comac C919 is cheaper than Airbus A320-100.
- Bombardier CRJ-1000
- Bombardier CRJ-1000 is manufactured by Bombardier.
- Bombardier CRJ-1000 can accommodate 100 seats passengers. 👎 Comac C919 has more seats than Bombardier CRJ-1000.
- The Bombardier CRJ-1000 is equipped with Turbofan. 👉 undefined.
- The fuel efficiency of Bombardier CRJ-1000 is 1.8 nautical miles per gallon nautical miles per gallon. 👎 Comac C919 is more fuel efficient than Bombardier CRJ-1000.
- The price of Bombardier CRJ-1000 is 35000000 USD. 👎 Comac C919 is cheaper than Bombardier CRJ-1000.
- Airbus A319neo
- Airbus A319neo is manufactured by Airbus.
- Airbus A319neo can accommodate 160 seats passengers. 👎 Comac C919 has more seats than Airbus A319neo.
- The Airbus A319neo is equipped with Turbofan. 👉 undefined.
- The fuel efficiency of Airbus A319neo is 3 nautical miles per gallon nautical miles per gallon. 👉 Comac C919 has same fuel efficiency as Airbus A319neo.
- The price of Airbus A319neo is 101500000 USD. 👍 Airbus A319neo is cheaper than Comac C919.
- Airbus A220-100
- Airbus A220-100 is manufactured by Airbus.
- Airbus A220-100 can accommodate 135 seats passengers. 👎 Comac C919 has more seats than Airbus A220-100.
- The Airbus A220-100 is equipped with Turbofan. 👉 undefined.
- The fuel efficiency of Airbus A220-100 is 3.8 nautical miles per gallon nautical miles per gallon. 👍 Airbus A220-100 is more fuel efficient than Comac C919.
- The price of Airbus A220-100 is 81000000 USD. 👎 Comac C919 is cheaper than Airbus A220-100.
- Embraer E175
- Embraer E175 is manufactured by Embraer. 👍 undefined.
- Embraer E175 can accommodate 76 seats passengers. 👎 Comac C919 has more seats than Embraer E175.
- The Embraer E175 is equipped with Turbofan. 👉 undefined.
- The fuel efficiency of Embraer E175 is 2.8 nautical miles per gallon nautical miles per gallon. 👎 Comac C919 is more fuel efficient than Embraer E175.
- The price of Embraer E175 is 35000000 USD. 👎 Comac C919 is cheaper than Embraer E175.
- Airbus A318
- Airbus A318 is manufactured by Airbus.
- Airbus A318 can accommodate 132 seats passengers. 👎 Comac C919 has more seats than Airbus A318.
- The Airbus A318 is equipped with Turbofan. 👉 undefined.
- The fuel efficiency of Airbus A318 is 2.9 nautical miles per gallon nautical miles per gallon. 👎 Comac C919 is more fuel efficient than Airbus A318.
- The price of Airbus A318 is 75000000 USD. 👎 Comac C919 is cheaper than Airbus A318.