Compact mode
ATR 72-600 vs ATR 42-300
Table of content
Basic Information Comparison
Manufacturer π’
The company responsible for designing and manufacturing the aircraft, representing the primary producer of the commercial airplane.Both*Engine Type β
A crucial component that defines the aircraft's propulsion system and performance characteristics,determining factors in speed,range and operational capabilities.Both*
Performance Comparison
Maximum Range π
The maximum distance the aircraft can fly without refueling, measured in nautical miles.ATR 72-600ATR 42-300Fuel Efficiency β½
Measures how efficiently the aircraft consumes fuel during operation,typically expressed in nautical miles per gallon or fuel burn rate.ATR 72-600ATR 42-300Fuel Efficiency Type β½
Classification of the aircraft's fuel consumption efficiency level,helping operators understand relative efficiency.Both*Maximum Altitude π
The highest altitude at which the aircraft can safely and effectively operate,affecting route planning and operational capabilities.Both*Maximum Altitude Type π
Classification of the aircraft's maximum operational altitude capability,categorizing its high-altitude performance.Both*
Facts Comparison
Interesting Fact π
Unique historical or technical fact about the aircraftATR 72-600- Most popular turboprop
ATR 42-300- First ATR aircraft model
Sarcastic Fact π€£
Humorous or ironic observation about the aircraftATR 72-600- Proof that propellers aren't extinct
ATR 42-300- The flying tractor
Commercial Comparison
Specifications Comparison
Seating Capacity π₯
The maximum number of passengers that can be accommodated in the aircraft's standard configuration, determining its operational capacity.ATR 72-600ATR 42-300Seating Capacity Type βοΈ
Classification of aircraft based on their passenger capacity, categorizing them into different operational segments.Both*
General Comparison
For whom π€
Target user groups or organizations that typically operate this aircraft typeATR 72-600- Regional TravelersATR 72-600 is primarily operated by Regional Travelers. Aircraft suitable for frequent regional travel with enhanced comfort features Click to see all.
- Island HoppersATR 72-600 is primarily operated by Island Hoppers.
ATR 42-300Purpose π―
Primary purposes and missions the aircraft is designed to fulfillATR 72-600- Short RoutesATR 72-600 is primarily used for Short Routes. Aircraft designed for efficient short-distance travel Click to see all.
- Island ConnectionsATR 72-600 is primarily used for Island Connections. Aircraft suitable for island-hopping and coastal operations Click to see all.
ATR 42-300- Short-HaulATR 42-300 is primarily used for Short-Haul.
- Remote AccessATR 42-300 is primarily used for Remote Access. Aircraft capable of operating in remote and challenging locations Click to see all.
Features Comparison
Known For π‘
Distinctive characteristic or notable feature of the aircraftATR 72-600- Fuel EfficiencyATR 72-600 is known for Fuel Efficiency.
ATR 42-300- Fuel EconomyATR 42-300 is known for Fuel Economy.
- ReliabilityATR 42-300 is known for Reliability.
Pros β
Key advantages and strong points of the aircraftATR 72-600- Economic Operations
- Reliability
ATR 42-300Cons β
Main disadvantages or limitations of the aircraftBoth*- Speed Limitations
ATR 72-600ATR 42-300- Capacity Constraints
Ratings Comparison
Reliability Score π§
Reliability rating based on maintenance records and operational historyATR 72-600ATR 42-300Comfort Score π±
Passenger comfort rating considering cabin design and amenitiesATR 72-600ATR 42-300
Alternatives to ATR 72-600
ATR 72-200
Known for Fuel Economy,Reliabilityπ₯ has more seats than ATR 42-300
π flies longer than ATR 42-300
β½ is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-300
π± is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
β³ is more durable than ATR 42-300
β is better overall than ATR 42-300
ATR 42-600
Known for Fuel Efficiency,Reliabilityπ flies longer than ATR 42-300
ATR 42-500
Known for Fuel Economyβ½ is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-300
π± is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
ATR 72-500
Known for Fuel Efficiency,Reliabilityπ₯ has more seats than ATR 42-300
π flies longer than ATR 42-300
β½ is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-300
π± is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
ATR 72-400
Known for Cost Effectivenessπ₯ has more seats than ATR 42-300
π flies longer than ATR 42-300
ATR 72-700
Known for Fuel Efficient Turbopropπ₯ has more seats than ATR 42-300
π flies longer than ATR 42-300
β½ is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-300
π± is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
π‘ is safer than ATR 42-300
β is better overall than ATR 42-300
Saab 340
Known for Reliability,Efficiencyπ flies longer than ATR 42-300
π± is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
π‘ is safer than ATR 42-300
Bombardier Q300
Known for Noise Reduction,Efficiencyπ§ is more reliable than ATR 42-300
π₯ has more seats than ATR 42-300
π flies longer than ATR 42-300
π± is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
π‘ is safer than ATR 42-300
β is better overall than ATR 42-300
Bombardier Q400
Known for Performance,Versatilityπ₯ has more seats than ATR 42-300
π flies longer than ATR 42-300
π flies higher than ATR 42-300
π± is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
π‘ is safer than ATR 42-300
Embraer E175-E2
Known for Efficiency,Modern Designπ₯ has more seats than ATR 42-300
π flies longer than ATR 42-300
π flies higher than ATR 42-300
π± is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
π‘ is safer than ATR 42-300
β is better overall than ATR 42-300